- Open Access
Universal platform for quantitative analysis of DNA transposition
© Pajunen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 5 July 2010
- Accepted: 26 November 2010
- Published: 26 November 2010
Completed genome projects have revealed an astonishing diversity of transposable genetic elements, implying the existence of novel element families yet to be discovered from diverse life forms. Concurrently, several better understood transposon systems have been exploited as efficient tools in molecular biology and genomics applications. Characterization of new mobile elements and improvement of the existing transposition technology platforms warrant easy-to-use assays for the quantitative analysis of DNA transposition.
Here we developed a universal in vivo platform for the analysis of transposition frequency with class II mobile elements, i.e., DNA transposons. For each particular transposon system, cloning of the transposon ends and the cognate transposase gene, in three consecutive steps, generates a multifunctional plasmid, which drives inducible expression of the transposase gene and includes a mobilisable lacZ-containing reporter transposon. The assay scores transposition events as blue microcolonies, papillae, growing within otherwise whitish Escherichia coli colonies on indicator plates. We developed the assay using phage Mu transposition as a test model and validated the platform using various MuA transposase mutants. For further validation and to illustrate universality, we introduced IS903 transposition system components into the assay. The developed assay is adjustable to a desired level of initial transposition via the control of a plasmid-borne E. coli arabinose promoter. In practice, the transposition frequency is modulated by varying the concentration of arabinose or glucose in the growth medium. We show that variable levels of transpositional activity can be analysed, thus enabling straightforward screens for hyper- or hypoactive transposase mutants, regardless of the original wild-type activity level.
The established universal papillation assay platform should be widely applicable to a variety of mobile elements. It can be used for mechanistic studies to dissect transposition and provides a means to screen or scrutinise transposase mutants and genes encoding host factors. In succession, improved versions of transposition systems should yield better tools for molecular biology and offer versatile genome modification vehicles for many types of studies, including gene therapy and stem cell research.
- Transposition Event
- Transposase Gene
- Transposition Frequency
- Transpositional Activity
- PBAD Promoter
Transposable DNA elements constitute a class of discrete genome segments capable of moving from one genomic location to another . These common genome residents are present in all kingdoms of life, being particularly abundant in eukaryotes [1, 2], where they cover a sizeable fraction of the genome space (e.g., ~45% in human  and nearly 85% in maize ). Completed genome sequences demonstrate a wide diversity among mobile DNA and imply the existence of novel transposable element families yet to be discovered from a multitude of diverse life forms . Mobile DNA elements produce genetic variation, supply material for genome innovations (e.g., new genes) and provoke genome instability , evidently earning them a highly significant role in the course of evolution.
Transposable elements can be exploited in many types of advanced genetic studies. Typical applications include insertional mutagenesis , genome manipulation , transgenesis , functional genomics studies [9, 10], gene therapy [11, 12] and generation of induced pluripotent stem cells . Such methodologies are currently under strong development, and it is expected that novel transposition-based applications and new strategies will emerge in the near future.
Transposable elements which move via a DNA intermediate (i.e., class II elements or DNA transposons ) are widespread, both in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes. For transposition, they share a common overall reaction mechanism, albeit with some variation in details among different element families . Characteristically, DNA transposons are mobilised by a machinery typically encoded by the elements themselves, and the most critical component is the catalytic protein, a transposase. Initiating transposition, the transposase binds sequence-specifically the transposon ends and, by synapsing the ends as a multimer, assembles a protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. Within the transpososome, transposase catalyses two chemical reactions, donor DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer, ultimately attaching the transposon DNA to the target DNA. Because of the unity in their reaction mechanisms , similar research approaches and analytical methods can be used to study both prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA transposons.
Bacteriophage Mu uses DNA transposition for propagation and encodes one of the most thoroughly characterised transposition machineries . Despite the complexity of Mu transposition in natural contexts (e.g., certain auxiliary factors involved; see Discussion), a substantially simpler reaction can be performed in vitro. This minimal component reaction requires only a simple reaction buffer and three purified macromolecular components: MuA transposase, mini-Mu transposon DNA and target DNA . The minimal system yields transposition products highly efficiently and with low target site selectivity [15, 16]. In general, these properties make the Mu reaction ideal for a variety of advanced molecular biology [15, 17–19], protein engineering [20–22] and genomics [9, 23] applications. With an addition of an in vivo step, the minimal system can also be used for efficient gene delivery in bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells [24–26].
Various methods have been developed in the past for the in vivo analysis of transposition frequency, with typical examples including mating-out and phage assays [27, 28], but these methods are not ideal for large-scale studies. Currently, the most widely used methods to study transposition in vivo exploit coloured microcolonies (papillae), growing within otherwise colourless bacterial colonies. Initially, such papillation assays were designed to score events involving transposon excision from a specific gene locus . More recently, most papillation assays have exploited a reporter transposon, typically including lacZ as a marker gene. Insertion of the reporter transposon into a genomic locus under the control of an active promoter would generate a gene fusion, facilitating the expression of the lacZ gene, detectable as coloured Lac+ papillae on colourless Lac- colonies. The number of papillae per colony is proportional to the frequency of transposition events catalysed by the transposase. Useable papillation assays are currently available for a number of transposons, and typical examples include the assays for Tn5 , Tn7 , Tn10 , IS903  and Mu . All present-day papillation assays are characteristically element-specific, many of them lack adjustability and some are complicated by the use of several plasmids. Clearly, there exists a need for further methodology development, and a papillation assay that could eliminate the above limitations would be beneficial.
An increasing number of transposon systems have recently been adapted for advanced molecular biology and genomics applications, and their modification for better performance is under development. Concurrently, owing to genome projects, new transposons are being discovered essentially on a daily basis. Both improvement of the existing transposition applications and characterization of new transposition systems require robust quantitative assays. In this report, we describe a general in vivo platform for the quantitative analysis of transposition that should be applicable to a variety of mobile DNA elements.
Initially, we constructed the papillation assay plasmid pLHH4 (Figure 1a), which encodes the phage Mu transposase and, in addition, contains a mobilisable mini-Mu reporter transposon. This pBR322-derived plasmid exhibits medium copy number and encodes β-lactamase as a standard selectable marker. The plasmid also includes the arabinose/glucose-controllable PBAD promoter of E. coli, driving the inducible expression of MuA transposase. The expression unit is bordered by strong transcription terminators to prevent surplus gene expression from sequences flanking the unit. The mini-Mu transposon (Δ1-8LacZ-Cat-Mu) contains, as an inverted repeat, a 50-bp segment of Mu R-end DNA in each of the transposon ends. As a reporter gene, the transposon contains a promoterless, 5'-terminally truncated E. coli lacZ gene (Δ 1-8 lacZ), lacking the codons for amino acids 1-8. The transposon also includes the cat gene for chloramphenicol selection.
The papillation assay for Mu transposition takes advantage of the introduction of the plasmid pLHH4 into a phenotypically Lac- E. coli strain, and the plasmid facilitates the reporter transposon mobilisation upon sufficient transposase expression. Successful transposition into an expressed chromosomal gene in the appropriate orientation and reading frame gives rise to lacZ gene fusions. These events can be detected as blue papillae on a colony grown on an indicator plate containing X-gal, with each papilla representing an independent transposition event (Figure 1b).
Colony phenotypes and papillation characteristics of different E. coli strains
Colony phenotypes and papillation characteristics in different E. coli strains
Maximum frequencyof transpositionb
Distribution ofpapillae on colonies
Papillae number dependency on the number of growing colonies per platec
High (up to ~100 papillae)
Centered in the middle
Highest (up to ~300 papillae)
Intermediate (up to ~40 papillae)
Low (up to ~10 papillae)
Strain DH10B formed large colonies with a convex center and generated a relatively high maximum number of papillae. The number of papillae generated responded to the increase in the arabinose concentration, but not linearly, and two maxima were observed (at 0.001 and 1% arabinose concentrations; data not shown). The reason for this somewhat unexpected behaviour is not known but might possibly point to unknown alterations in the arabinose transporter systems (see Discussion). Most papillae were distributed in the center of the colony, and the number of papillae on even-sized colonies was somewhat influenced by the number of growing colonies per plate (Additional file 2).
Strain DH5α formed large flat colonies, and the number of papillae correlated well with the arabinose concentration in the growth medium. A high maximum number of clearly defined papillae formed throughout a colony. The number of growing colonies per plate did not overly influence the frequency of transposition. Particularly within the range of 40 to 200 colonies per plate, papillae formed with a very similar rate (Additional file 2).
Strain JM109 generated medium-size, irregularly shaped colonies. The number of papillae on a colony was proportional to the arabinose concentration used, reaching the level of ~40 papillae per colony upon 115-h incubation. Up to ~120 papillae per colony formed with a prolonged (164 h) incubation time (data not shown). Clearly defined papillae formed throughout a colony, but curiously, ~7% of the colonies appeared completely white, thus exhibiting Lac- phenotype; the same clones were also proline auxotrophs (data not shown). These data point to the loss of the resident F'-episome, which in this strain encodes the critical lactose utilization and proline biosynthesis proteins.
The control strain HT321 generated large colonies and with the 115-h reference incubation time exhibited a low transposition frequency (up to ~10 papillae per colony), too low to unambiguously evaluate arabinose responsiveness. However, with prolonged incubation time (164 h), up to ~30 papillae per colony could be observed, and arabinose dependency was apparent (data not shown).
The effect of temperature on transposition frequency
MuA expression and transposition frequency
The expression level of MuA transposase should influence the transposition frequency measurable by the papillation assay. We therefore studied the MuA expression level and transposition frequency under variable inducer concentrations. The former was studied using liquid cultures and the latter, in a separate experiment, using papillation analysis on plate cultures.
Transposition frequency was subsequently analysed under variable arabinose concentrations by the papillation assay (Figure 3b). Papillae began to appear at ~1 × 10-4% arabinose concentration, and the highest number of discernible papillae was obtained at 1 × 10-1% concentration. Higher arabinose concentrations apparently affected cell survival significantly, as colonies were smaller (Figure 3b) and ragged (data not shown). Furthermore, at these concentrations, the papillae were fuzzy with diffuse colour and impossible to enumerate. These data indicated that measurable papillation could be induced over a wide range of arabinose concentrations.
In general, the MuA expression levels observed from liquid cultures correlated well with the papillation data obtained from plate cultures. However, some discrepancy was seen at 1 × 10-1% arabinose concentration (Figure 3a and 3b). This latter result likely reflects key differences between the analyses, liquid versus plate cultures. In liquid cultures, the ambient arabinose concentration should be equal for all cells, and this is not necessarily the case for cells growing as colonies on agar plates. With regard to the arabinose concentration, the microenvironment within a colony on a plate may vary for each individual cell. Furthermore, the actual arabinose concentration experienced by the cells within a colony conceivably is, in general, somewhat lower than that in the medium because of diffusion characteristics and colony morphology.
The effect of MuA activity on transposition frequency
We include a time-lapsed video of growing colonies from a papillation analysis (Additional file 3), which highlights graphically the characteristics the developed assay. The video was recorded using papillation conditions where wild-type MuA produced only a few papillae (1 × 10-4% arabinose). Using these assay conditions, we have recently identified a number of hyperactive MuA variants, and a comprehensive analysis of critical amino acid changes involved in their hyperactivity phenotype will be described in a future report.
Universal plasmid for papillation analysis
We next modified the papillation assay plasmid pLHH4 to be useful with other DNA transposons. In this modified plasmid, pSKT1 (Additional file 4), the Mu R-ends have been replaced by polylinkers, allowing a straightforward directional cloning of heterologous transposon ends. Similarly, the MuA transposase gene is also replaced by a polylinker, facilitating directional cloning of a heterologous transposase gene. The functionality of the universal system was then confirmed as follows: (1) Mu R-ends were recloned into the appropriate newly made linker sites and tested in the context of wild-type MuA; a similar number of papillae were generated, as was observed with the original papillation assay plasmid pLHH4 (data not shown). (2) When the Mu R-ends were omitted, no papillae were produced, further illustrating the specificity of the assay system (similar to the omission of the MuA transposase gene discussed above). (3) Finally, the components of the IS903 transposition system were introduced into pSKT1, and the ensuing plasmid pSKT4 (Additional file 5) was analysed for transpositional activity (results described in the next subsection).
Analysis of IS903 transposition
Papillation assay systems have provided straightforward means to dissect transposition events in vivo. For example, they have enabled simultaneous activity analyses of tens of thousands of randomly generated transposase mutants [31, 37–40]. Furthermore, such assays have successfully been used to study the effects of mutations in transposon end sequences [30, 34, 41–43] and to examine the influence of host factors . Although each particular assay system has performed adequately in the context in which it has been used, in many cases the adjustability has been limited. Furthermore, many of the assays have included a reporter transposon and the cognate transposase gene separately in different plasmids, which is not an ideal arrangement for many applications.
The system we describe provides certain advantages. First, the assay is based on an easy-to-use single plasmid, and it offers a straightforward means to visually screen mutant versions of transposases as well as potentiates the discovery of host factors affecting transposition. Second, the inclusion of two antibiotic marker genes in the assay plasmid, bla and cat, enables double antibiotic selection, which effectively prevents the growth of satellite colonies on plates during the long incubation period needed for papillation. Note that the cat marker gene within the reporter transposon can also be used for the selection of transposition events, a useful feature in prospective downstream applications such as mating-out assays. Third, the transposition frequency is easily adjustable, which potentiates many types of studies under a desired optimal rate of transposition.
The expression system used in our assay, the arabinose-controllable induction via PBAD promoter, has been studied in detail previously . The study revealed that with standard E. coli strains harbouring native arabinose transporter systems araE and araFGH, the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter is subject to essentially all-or-none induction via a regulatory feedback loop, in which limiting arabinose concentrations give rise to subpopulations of cells that are either highly induced or uninduced . Raising the arabinose concentration increases the fraction of highly induced cells until a saturating concentration is reached, under which concentration essentially all of the cells in the population become highly induced . Nevertheless, even under these saturating arabinose concentrations, a degree of variation exists among the expression levels of individual cells . Considering the above features, it was expected that in our assay system, only a fraction of cells would express the transposase within any given colony under subsaturating arabinose concentrations, and those cells expressing the transposase would be the ones which ultimately produced the observed papillae. Further considering the above features, although all-or-none induction should generate two subpopulations of cells, a degree of transposase expression variation should still be present within these subpopulations in both subsaturating and saturating arabinose concentrations. Overall, our results have shown that good control of population level average transposase expression can be achieved using the PBAD promoter, at least under subsaturating arabinose concentrations. Under these conditions, the transposase expression levels correlate very well with the formation of papillae, forming a basis for a dependable quantitative assay.
The omission of arabinose on selection plates effectively eliminated transposition in the Mu system, but identical conditions resulted in a reasonable level of transposition in the IS903 system. These data indicate that the PBAD control unit of transposase expression in the papillation assay plasmid allows some basal protein expression. As it is likely that similar expression levels would be achieved independently of the expressed protein, the observed differences between Mu and IS903 most probably reflect differences in the inherent activities of the two systems (in the conditions tested) rather than differences in the transposase expression levels. The observed activity differences are necessarily not surprising, because the analysed Mu system is somewhat aberrant (unnatural transposon end configuration, lack of transposition enhancer, lack of MuB protein), whereas the analysed IS903 transposition represents a wild-type system.
We examined several E. coli strains for their suitability in the papillation assay. From these studies, it became evident that a number of critical attributes affecting the assay performance were strain-dependent, evidently reflecting known (plus possibly unknown) genotypic differences, and by all criteria DH5α appeared optimal for the assay. First, the large colony size and the even distribution pattern of papillae within a colony allowed scoring of more than 500 discernible papillae. Second, the adjustability of the assay spans a wide range of arabinose concentrations. Together, these attributes generated a large dynamic range for the assay, and the use of glucose extended the adjustability even further. Third, the colony density on a plate did not influence papillation appreciably, in practice meaning that reliable results could be obtained from standard plates (diameter 9 cm) containing ~50-200 growing colonies.
Several MuA variants were scrutinised for their transpositional activity to test the assay under different levels of transposase activity. Overall, the results showed that activities above and below a certain (in this case, wild-type MuA) activity level could reliably be analysed, potentiating the screen for hyperactive and hypoactive mutants (Figure 4b and 5). MuA77-663, missing the Iα domain , has been shown to be hyperactive in certain in vitro assays . Similar hyperactivity was also seen in its proficiency to produce papillae. MuA1-615, lacking the C-terminal 48 amino acids , retains a wild-type level of activity in certain in vitro assays [47, 48]. However, in our in vivo analysis, it was clearly hypoactive. The details behind the apparent discrepancy are unknown but may reflect the deficiency in the disassembly of the transpososome via ClpX-mediated interaction, a property confined to the C-terminus of MuA . MuA77-615, having both the Iα domain and the C-terminal residues deleted, retained substantial activity. Thus, the hyperactivity-causing property of the domain Iα deletion appeared to compensate for the activity reduction caused by the deletion in the C-terminus.
Mu transposition can be reproduced in vitro using as sole components MuA transposase, transposons that contain 50 bp of Mu R-end in each transposon terminus, and target DNA. This minimal reaction forms the basis of the Mu in vitro transposition technology . With an overall aim to improve the technology, we designed our assay system to mimic this minimal in vitro transposition reaction as closely as possible. Accordingly, we used a reporter transposon which contains two R-ends and did not include in the system the known auxiliary factors of Mu transposition, such as the transposition enhancer (IAS) and activator/targeting protein MuB . Our results demonstrate that Mu transposition in vivo can proceed efficiently independent of the natural L/R (left/right) end configuration and in the absence of the above auxiliary factors. While a massive number of Mu studies have employed the natural L/R end combination for studies in vivo, significantly less in vivo data are available with regard the L/L or R/R end configurations. Nevertheless, these configurations have been shown to promote transposition in vivo, albeit with reduced efficiency, and to generate correct junctions between the Mu DNA and host DNA (unpublished data in ). Falling outside the scope of the current study, we did not analyse the effects on transposition of the known E. coli host factors, HU and IHF. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to see whether these two proteins were dispensable under the described in vivo conditions as well.
The papillation assay platform should be applicable to a number of transposition systems. For cut-and-paste type transposons, papillation assays generate gene fusions by the initial detachment of the transposon from the donor site, followed by the integration of the transposon into another locus. Thus, the mechanistic basis of the assay for cut-and-paste transposons is relatively simple. However, Mu and IS903 primarily use the replicative mode of transposition, a somewhat more complicated mechanism. During replicative transposition, a branched transposition intermediate (a/k/a Shapiro intermediate) is formed. This intermediate can be processed either by DNA replication or by DNA repair, and it is known that Mu uses both of these pathways for processing . However, in this work, we have not studied the mechanistic details of the assay. Recent findings indicate that several pathways may be involved in the processing of the Shapiro intermediate , which necessarily would complicate such studies. As retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons catalyse a mechanistically related (transposition) reaction called integration , it might be possible to apply the assay platform also for them. However, in these cases, the interplay between the integrase protein and other proteins of the integration machinery may complicate the development of a useable strategy.
We have established a papillation assay platform which is easily modifiable for a variety of transposon systems. It provides an efficient tool for the studies of yet unknown transposons and yields means to screen and scrutinise transposase mutants as well as genes encoding critical host factors involved in transposition. Although in this paper we used the papillation assay with two prokaryotic transposons, the system may equally be applied to eukaryotic DNA transposons as well. It is hoped that the use of the developed platform will generate better versions of transposition systems, ultimately producing better tools for molecular biology and offering versatile genome modification vehicles for a variety of future studies. These investigations are expected to involve disciplines such as cancer biology, gene therapy, stem cell research and studies on transgenesis.
Bacteria, plasmids and oligonucleotides
Reagents, enzymes and DNA techniques
Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, arabinose and glucose were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Lactose was from BDH/VWR International (West Chester, PA, USA) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) was from AppliChem GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase were from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). Calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) was from Finnzymes (Espoo, Finland). Standard DNA techniques were performed as described previously . Plasmids were propagated in E. coli DH5α and were isolated using appropriate Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) kits. Electrocompetent DH5α cells were prepared as described previously  and used for standard cloning procedures.
Construction of the papillation assay plasmid expressing wild-type MuA transposase
The papillation assay plasmid pLHH4 (Figure 1a), expressing wild-type MuA transposase (GenBank accession number P07636) was generated as follows: (1) A truncated version of the lacZ gene, encoding E. coli β-galactosidase (EC 22.214.171.124) but missing the nucleotides specifying the amino acids 1-8 (Δ 1-8 lacZ), was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from plasmid pNT105 using the primer pair HSP173/HSP408. The generated PCR fragment was trimmed with Bam HI and subsequently cloned into plasmid pSupF-Mu between the two Bam HI sites to replace the supF gene, yielding plasmid pLHH1. (2) The cat gene was amplified by PCR from plasmid pBC SK(+) using the primer pair HSP360/HSP361. The generated PCR fragment was trimmed with Bam HI and cloned downstream of Δ 1-8 lacZ into Bam HI-linearized pLHH1 (partial digestion), yielding plasmid pLHH2. Prior to cloning, the cat gene was modified by introducing, via overlap PCR with appropriate primers, a silent mutation (codon 177, Thr, ACC→ACT) to eliminate a critical Nco I site. (3) An Sph I-fragment containing the tandem E. coli rrnB terminators T1+T2  and phage λ tR' terminator  as well as a critical Bam HI site for cloning was generated by standard DNA techniques including PCR and annealing of oligonucleotides (see Additional file 7). (4) The above terminator-containing Sph I-fragment was then cloned into Sph I-digested pALH6 to generate pLHH3. (5) Finally, the mini-Mu transposon of pLHH2 was released with Bgl II and cloned into Bam HI-linearised pLHH3 (partial digestion) to generate pLHH4.
MuA variant-expressing papillation assay plasmids
Initially, plasmid pTLH1 was generated by cloning the 5.2-kb Sph I reporter-containing fragment of pLHH4 into Sph I-digested pBADHisA, which substituted the MuA gene with the polylinker of pBADHisA. PCR-generated MuA deletion variants (pMPH14, pMPH17, pMPH18; see Additional files 6 and 7) were subsequently cloned between the Nco I and Xho I sites of pTLH1. The plasmid expressing MuA E392Q (pLHH12) was generated by cloning the Nco I-Bam HI fragment of pMK616 into pTLH1 digested with Nco I and Bgl II.
Construction of universal papillation assay plasmid
Initially, the reporter region of pLHH2 containing the Δ 1-8 lacZ and cat genes was amplified by PCR using the linker-sequence-tailed primers HSP685 and HSP689 (see Additional file 7). The generated PCR fragment was trimmed with Bgl II and cloned into Bam HI-linearized pLHH3 (partial digestion), yielding plasmid pMPH23B. Finally, the universal papillation assay plasmid pSKT1 (Additional file 4) was obtained by replacing the MuA-containing Nco I-Sca I fragment of pMPH23B with the polylinker-containing Nco I-Sca I fragment of pBADHisA. Plasmid pSKT1 can be applied to establish a papillation assay for various transposon systems in three straightforward cloning steps involving transposon ends and a cognate transposase gene.
Construction of papillation assay plasmid for IS903
The IS903 transposase gene was amplified by PCR from plasmid pNT105 using the primer pair HSP693/HSP694. The PCR fragment was trimmed with Nco I and Xho I and cloned into plasmid pSKT1 digested with the same two enzymes, yielding plasmid pSKT2. The ends of IS903 were then inserted as follows. First, oligonucleotides HSP690 and HSP691 were annealed and cloned into pSKT2 digested with Spe I and Not I, resulting in plasmid pSKT3. Second, oligonucleotides HSP690 and HSP692 were annealed and cloned into pSKT3, digested initially with Xba I and then partially with Xma I, yielding the IS903 papillation assay plasmid pSKT4.
Each papillation assay plasmid was transformed into competent E. coli cells prepared and used as described previously . In a standard assay, cells were plated at approximately 100 c.f.u. (colony forming units) per plate. Standard plates contained LB medium  supplemented with 1.5% Bacto-agar (Difco/Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA), 100 μg/ml ampicillin (Ap), 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol (Cm), 0.05% lactose, 40 μg/ml X-gal, and 0.1% arabinose. For the experiments with IS903 transposition, glucose replaced arabinose for the adjustment of the transposase expression. In standard assays, the plates were incubated at 30°C for 115 h. To study the suitability of different E. coli strains, the effect of arabinose concentration, as well as growth temperature and time, were varied. The effect on papillation of the number of growing colonies per plate was studied by plating cells to produce different colony densities. For each data point, three to six representative colonies were photographed using an Olympus (Tokyo, Japan) ColorView II digital camera attached to an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope equipped with Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) KL1500 LCD cold light source. The size of the colonies was measured, and the number of papillae in each colony was enumerated manually by the use of AnalySIS software (Soft Imaging System, Olympus). The same imaging system was used for the time-lapsed video recording (Additional file 3).
The expression of wild-type MuA protein at different arabinose concentrations was determined by analysing whole-cell lysates using sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). For protein expression, E. coli DH5α(pLHH4) cells were grown in LB-Ap-Cm medium (5 ml) at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.5, and MuA expression was induced by the addition of arabinose. Following incubation at 28°C for 2 h, cells from 0.5 ml of the culture were pelleted and resuspended in 150 μl of 1× SB loading buffer (100 mM Tris·HCl, pH 6.8, 200 mM dithiothreitol, 4% SDS, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 20% wt/wt glycerol). The proteins (5 μl of 1:8 diluted sample in 1× SB) were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and blotted onto Immobilon™P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MD, USA) using the Mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The membrane was blocked at room temperature overnight using 5% skim milk powder dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer . Following a wash with PBS, the membrane was probed with the primary rabbit anti-MuA antibody (1:1,000 dilution) and subsequently with the secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit (from donkey; Amersham Biosciences/GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) Ig antibody (1:10,000 dilution). The bound peroxidase was detected using the ECL Plus Western Blotting System (Amersham Biosciences/GE Healthcare,) as specified by the supplier. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a Fujifilm LAS-3000 system (Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
We thank George Chaconas (University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada) for the generous gift of rabbit anti-MuA polyclonal antibody. We acknowledge Keith Derbyshire (University of Albany, Albany, NY, USA) for providing the E. coli strains DH10B and HT321 as well as plasmid pNT105. We thank Sari Tynkkynen and Pirjo Rahkola for excellent technical assistance. This study was funded by the Academy of Finland, the Finnish National Technology Agency (TEKES) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation.
- Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM: Mobile DNA II. 2002, Washington, DC: ASM PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feschotte C, Pritham EJ: DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2007, 41: 331-368. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lander ES: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409: 860-921. 10.1038/35057062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schnable PS: The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009, 326: 1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biemont C, Vieira C: Genetics: junk DNA as an evolutionary force. Nature. 2006, 443: 521-524. 10.1038/443521a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy AJ, Akagi K, Largaespada DA, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA: Mammalian mutagenesis using a highly mobile somatic Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Nature. 2005, 436: 221-226. 10.1038/nature03691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert V, Bessereau JL: Targeted engineering of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome following Mos1-triggered chromosomal breaks. EMBO J. 2007, 26: 170-183. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601463.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson KA, Goyard S, Beverley SM: In vitro shuttle mutagenesis using engineered mariner transposons. Methods Mol Biol. 2004, 270: 299-318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kekarainen T, Savilahti H, Valkonen JP: Functional genomics on potato virus A: virus genome-wide map of sites essential for virus propagation. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 584-594. 10.1101/gr.220702.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miskey C, Izsvák Z, Kawakami K, Ivics Z: DNA transposons in vertebrate functional genomics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005, 62: 629-641. 10.1007/s00018-004-4232-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivics Z, Izsvák Z: Transposons for gene therapy!. Curr Gene Ther. 2006, 6: 593-607. 10.2174/156652306778520647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- VandenDriessche T, Ivics Z, Izsvak Z, Chuah MK: Emerging potential of transposons for gene therapy and generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Blood. 2009, 114: 1461-1468. 10.1182/blood-2009-04-210427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hickman AB, Chandler M, Dyda F: Integrating prokaryotes and eukaryotes: DNA transposases in light of structure. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2010, 45: 50-69. 10.3109/10409230903505596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chaconas G, Harshey RM: Transposition of phage Mu DNA. Mobile DNA II. Edited by: Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM. 2002, Washington, DC: ASM Press, 384-402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haapa S, Taira S, Heikkinen E, Savilahti H: An efficient and accurate integration of mini-Mu transposons in vitro: a general methodology for functional genetic analysis and molecular biology applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 2777-2784. 10.1093/nar/27.13.2777.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haapa-Paananen S, Rita H, Savilahti H: DNA transposition of bacteriophage Mu: a quantitative analysis of target site selection in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 2843-2851. 10.1074/jbc.M108044200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orsini L, Pajunen M, Hanski I, Savilahti H: SNP discovery by mismatch-targeting of Mu transposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: e44-10.1093/nar/gkm070.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pajunen M, Turakainen H, Poussu E, Peränen J, Vihinen M, Savilahti H: High-precision mapping of protein protein interfaces: an integrated genetic strategy combining en masse mutagenesis and DNA-level parallel analysis on a yeast two-hybrid platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: e103-10.1093/nar/gkm563.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turakainen H, Saarimaki-Vire J, Sinjushina N, Partanen J, Savilahti H: Transposition-based method for the rapid generation of gene-targeting vectors to produce Cre/Flp-modifiable conditional knock-out mice. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4341-10.1371/journal.pone.0004341.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poussu E, Jäntti J, Savilahti H: A gene truncation strategy generating N- and C-terminal deletion variants of proteins for functional studies: mapping of the Sec1p binding domain in yeast Mso1p by a Mu in vitro transposition-based approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: e104-10.1093/nar/gni102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poussu E, Vihinen M, Paulin L, Savilahti H: Probing the a-complementing domain of E. coli b-galactosidase with use of an insertional pentapeptide mutagenesis strategy based on Mu in vitro DNA transposition. Proteins. 2004, 54: 681-692. 10.1002/prot.10467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards WR, Busse K, Allemann RK, Jones DD: Linking the functions of unrelated proteins using a novel directed evolution domain insertion method. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: e78-10.1093/nar/gkn363.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vilen H, Aalto J-M, Kassinen A, Paulin L, Savilahti H: A direct transposon insertion tool for modification and functional analysis of viral genomes. J Virol. 2003, 77: 123-134. 10.1128/JVI.77.1.123-134.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamberg A, Nieminen S, Qiao M, Savilahti H: Efficient insertion mutagenesis strategy for bacterial genomes involving electroporation of in vitro-assembled DNA transposition complexes of bacteriophage Mu. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 705-712. 10.1128/AEM.68.2.705-712.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pajunen MI, Pulliainen AT, Finne J, Savilahti H: Generation of transposon insertion mutant libraries for Gram-positive bacteria by electroporation of phage Mu DNA transposition complexes. Microbiology. 2005, 151: 1209-1218. 10.1099/mic.0.27807-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paatero AO: Bacteriophage Mu integration in yeast and mammalian genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: e148-10.1093/nar/gkn801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller JH: A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria. 1992, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Weinreich MD, Reznikoff WS: Fis plays a role in Tn5 and IS50 transposition. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 4530-4537.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster TJ, Lundblad V, Hanley-Way S, Halling SM, Kleckner N: Three Tn10-associated excision events: relationship to transposition and role of direct and inverted repeats. Cell. 1981, 23: 215-227. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90286-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makris JC, Nordmann PL, Reznikoff WS: Mutational analysis of insertion sequence 50 (IS50) and transposon 5 (Tn5) ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 2224-2228. 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2224.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu F, Craig NL: Isolation and characterization of Tn7 transposase gain-of-function mutants: a model for transposase activation. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 3446-3457. 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3446.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bender J, Kleckner N: IS10 transposase mutations that specifically alter target site recognition. EMBO J. 1992, 11: 741-750.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Twiss E, Coros AM, Tavakoli NP, Derbyshire KM: Transposition is modulated by a diverse set of host factors in Escherichia coli and is stimulated by nutritional stress. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 57: 1593-1607. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04794.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee I, Harshey RM: Importance of the conserved CA dinucleotide at Mu termini. J Mol Biol. 2001, 314: 433-444. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Parkinson JS: Genetics and sequence analysis of the pcnB locus, an Escherichia coli gene involved in plasmid copy number control. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 1254-1261.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker TA, Luo L: Identification of residues in the Mu transposase essential for catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 6654-6658. 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6654.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, Harshey RM: Mutational analysis of the att DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 3937-3943. 10.1093/nar/23.19.3937.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bender J, Kleckner N: Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 7996-8000. 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7996.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naumann TA, Reznikoff WS: Tn5 transposase active site mutants. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 17623-17629. 10.1074/jbc.M200742200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derbyshire KM, Grindley ND: Cis preference of the IS903 transposase is mediated by a combination of transposase instability and inefficient translation. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 21: 1261-1272. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02587.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huisman O, Kleckner N: A new generalizable test for detection of mutations affecting Tn10 transposition. Genetics. 1987, 116: 185-189.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang Y, Cotterill S, Lichtenstein CP: Genetic analysis of the terminal 8-bp inverted repeats of transposon Tn7. Gene. 1995, 162: 41-46. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)92859-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tavakoli NP, Derbyshire KM: IS903 transposase mutants that suppress defective inverted repeats. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 31: 1183-1195. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01260.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siegele DA, Hu JC: Gene expression from plasmids containing the araBAD promoter at subsaturating inducer concentrations represents mixed populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 8168-8172. 10.1073/pnas.94.15.8168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K: Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: Implications for regulation. Cell. 1989, 58: 399-408. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clubb RT, Mizuuchi M, Huth JR, Omichinski JG, Savilahti H, Mizuuchi K, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM: The wing of the enhancer-binding domain of Mu phage transposase is flexible and is essential for efficient transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 1146-1150. 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker TA, Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K: MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu. Cell. 1991, 65: 1003-1013. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90552-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leung PC, Harshey RM: Two mutations of phage Mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains. J Mol Biol. 1991, 219: 189-199. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90561-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizuuchi K: Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: polarity of the strand transfer reaction at the initiation of transposition. Cell. 1984, 39: 395-404. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90018-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi W, Harshey RM: DNA repair by the cryptic endonuclease activity of Mu transposase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 10014-10019. 10.1073/pnas.0912615107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3 ednGoogle Scholar
- Orosz A, Boros I, Venetianer P: Analysis of the complex transcription termination region of the Escherichia coli rrnB gene. Eur J Biochem. 1991, 201: 653-659. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16326.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rees WA, Weitzel SE, Das A, von Hippel PH: Regulation of the elongation-termination decision at intrinsic terminators by antitermination protein N of phage λ. J Mol Biol. 1997, 273: 797-813. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D: Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983, 166: 557-580. 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant SG, Jessee J, Bloom FR, Hanahan D: Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 4645-4649. 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4645.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J: Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985, 33: 103-119. 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swingle B, O'Carroll M, Haniford D, Derbyshire KM: The effect of host-encoded nucleoid proteins on transposition: H-NS influences targeting of both IS903 and Tn10. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 1055-1067. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04051.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker TA, Mizuuchi M, Savilahti H, Mizuuchi K: Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell. 1993, 74: 723-733. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90519-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasila TS, Pajunen MI, Savilahti H: Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment. Anal Biochem. 2009, 388: 71-80. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.02.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.