- Open Access
flam piRNA precursors channel from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in a temporally regulated manner along Drosophila oogenesis
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 4 April 2019
- Accepted: 25 June 2019
- Published: 6 July 2019
PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are the effectors of transposable element silencing in the reproductive apparatus. In Drosophila ovarian somatic cells, piRNAs arise from long RNA precursors presumably processed within cytoplasmic Yb-bodies.
Here we show that the nucleo-cytoplasmic traffic of piRNA precursors encoded by the flamenco locus is subjected to a spatio-temporal regulation. Precursor RNAs first gather in a single nuclear focus, Dot COM, close to the nuclear periphery, and transit through the membrane before being delivered to the cytoplasmic Yb-bodies. Early in oogenesis, flamenco transcripts are rapidly transferred to the cytoplasm making their initial nuclear gathering in Dot COM too transient to be visualized. As oogenesis proceeds, the cytoplasmic delivery steadily decreases concomitantly with the decrease in the protein levels of Armi and Yb, two components of the Yb-bodies. Both events lead to a reduction of Yb-body assembly in late stages of oogenesis, which likely results in a drop in piRNA production.
Our findings show a spatio-temporal regulation of the piRNA biogenesis in the follicle cells of Drosophila ovaries, that involves coordinated control of both piRNA precursors and components of the piRNA processing machinery. This newly unveiled regulation establishes another level of complexity in the production of piRNAs and suggests a stage-dependent involvement of the piRNA biogenesis in the mechanism of transposable elements silencing along oogenesis.
- Transposable elements
- Dot COM
Eukaryotic genomes are composed of a variable proportion of transposable elements (TEs) accumulated throughout evolution. These sequences are silenced by the host to protect itself and its progeny against potentially deleterious mutations and genome invasion. In the gonads, where it is essential to ensure the maintenance of genome integrity for the next generation, the piRNA pathway is responsible for TE silencing in both somatic and germinal tissues [1–4]. This process involves small guide piRNAs of 23–29 nucleotides (nts) that originate from discrete genomic regions called piRNA clusters.
142 piRNA clusters have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster , mostly located in pericentromeric and telomeric regions. These clusters vary considerably in size from a few kilobases (kb) to several hundred kb. They are enriched in full length or truncated TEs that are often nested within one another [2, 5]. In ovarian somatic support cells surrounding the germline, piRNAs are mainly produced from two piRNA clusters: traffic jam  and flamenco (flam) [2, 7]. The flam cluster is located at the pericentromeric region of the X-chromosome, spans over more than 200 kb and is strongly enriched in both ancient and recent retrotransposons mostly inserted in an orientation antisense to the TE transcription . flam is transcribed from a polymerase II promoter as a long single-stranded RNA that is a substrate for piRNA biogenesis. Flam transcripts undergo alternative splicing to generate diverse piRNA precursors that all share the first exon at their 5′ end . These transcripts are then processed into 23–29 nt piRNAs, presumably in cytoplasmic Yb-bodies [9, 10]. Mature piRNAs associated with Piwi protein form a piRNA-induced silencing complex (piRISC) that is delivered to the nucleus to target nascent TE mRNAs and initiate transcriptional gene silencing [11, 12].
Two studies have reported that flam precursor transcripts, together with transcripts from other piRNA clusters, concentrate in 1 to 2 foci in ovarian follicle cells [13, 14]. Analysis of the subcellular localization of these sites of accumulation at different stages of development have yielded varying findings. The first study focused on follicle cells in late stages of oogenesis and showed that flam RNA precursors accumulate in a single nuclear substructure, named Dot COM, that faces the cytoplasmic Yb-body to which the flam precursors are channeled by nucleo-cytoplasmic transfer . A subsequent report  visualized flam transcripts concentrated within the cytoplasm in 1 to 2 substructures named flam bodies, located close to Yb-bodies. The authors worked mainly with a cultured Drosophila ovarian somatic stem cell line (OSS cells) derived from a somatic stem cell population of the germarium  that expresses a functional piRNA pathway .
We show here that flam transcripts are channeled to the cytoplasm in a temporally regulated manner. In early stages of oogenesis, they are mainly detected within the cytoplasm. As oogenesis proceeds, flam transcripts accumulate in a focus detected within the nucleus or within the nuclear membrane as though their delivery to the cytoplasm was impeded. Combined with a drop in Armi and Yb protein levels after stage 8, this affects the assembly of Yb-bodies which then are very small and absent from most cells. These findings emphasize the temporal regulation of Yb-body assembly, which requires both cytoplasmic flam delivery and Armi and Yb proteins. In their absence, Yb-bodies fail to assemble correctly, which potentially can cause a decrease in the production of piRNAs.
The cytoplasmic transfer of flam precursor transcripts decreases during ovariole development
In a previous study , we performed a global quantitative analysis of the subcellular localization of flam transcripts within ovarian somatic follicle cells, independently of the developmental stages of oogenesis. Depending on the follicle cell observed, the focus where flam precursors gathered was visualized either completely within the nucleus close to the nuclear periphery, or stretching across the nuclear membrane, or within the cytoplasm close to the nuclear membrane. To investigate whether this differential localization is somehow related to the stage of the developing egg chambers, we examined flam RNA precursors in follicle cells within egg chambers in stages 3 to 10 of oogenesis. To do so, we performed an immuno-RNA FISH experiment on WT Drosophila ovaries using an anti-lamin antibody to label the nuclear membrane, and a specific flam RNA probe described in . The same experiment was performed in parallel with OSS cells. The localization of flam foci was quantified as follows. When positioned close to the inner side or outer side of the lamin signal, foci were considered as nuclear within Dot COM or cytoplasmic within the Yb-bodies respectively. When co-localized with the lamin signal (totally or partially), the flam focus was considered as stretching across the nuclear membrane.
Secondly, focusing on the follicle cells that harbored a flam signal, we investigated its subcellular localization. We found that flam transcripts that accumulated mostly in a single focus, vary drastically in localization from early to late stages of oogenesis. In early stages, in a majority of follicle cells, 1 to 2 flam foci are observed within the cytoplasm (Fig. 1b, d, e). OSS cells, which derive from a somatic stem cell population of the germarium, and follicle cells from early stage 3, display a similar percentage of flam foci within the cytoplasm (around 62%) (Fig. 1b & c). This similarity may be explained by the intrinsic nature of these two cell types; both are highly dividing cells required to rapidly encapsulate the 16-cell germinal cyst. The percentage of cells with cytoplasmic flam foci decreases progressively to 10% at stage 10 of oogenesis. Concomitantly, the proportion of follicle cells in which a flam focus is detected within Dot COM increases, from 4% in stage 3 to 32% in stage 10 (Fig. 1b-g). The switch from a cytoplasmic to a nuclear position is progressive, suggesting that the export of piRNA precursors to the cytoplasm steadily decreases as oogenesis proceeds. This stage-by-stage analysis further emphasizes that an increasing fraction of flam RNAs co-localizes with the lamin staining. Interestingly, in late stages of oogenesis, the flam transcripts are even more likely to be detected spanning the nuclear membrane (57%) than within the nucleus (33%) and the cytoplasm (10%) (Fig. 1b). These data indicate that flam precursors can enter the nuclear membrane throughout oogenesis even in late stages but seem to lose progressively the ability to be delivered to the cytoplasm. This suggests that fewer piRNA precursors reach the Yb-bodies, thereby giving rise to fewer piRNAs in late stages of oogenenesis.
At early stages of Drosophila oogenesis, flam precursors rapidly transit to the cytoplasm
These findings indicate that, at early stages, in their traffic to the cytoplasm, flam transcripts are shuttled to the cytoplasm very rapidly. Export of the piRNA precursors is thus more efficient in early than in late stages of oogenesis.
At late stages of Drosophila oogenesis, flam precursors fail to be delivered to the cytoplasm
The second issue we addressed was to understand why the delivery of flam precursors from the membrane to the cytoplasm is steadily affected as oogenesis proceeds. We have previously shown that the export of flam precursor transcripts to the cytoplasm is the signal for the Yb-bodies to be assembled . If, as suggested above, flam precursors do not reach the cytoplasm in late stages, then the proportion of Yb-bodies is expected to decrease.
However, the decrease in Yb-body assembly in late stages of oogenesis cannot be attributed solely to the reduction of flam piRNA precursors exported to the cytoplasm. In the germarium, the follicle cells encapsulate the germline cyst and carry out a mitotic division program from stage 2 to stage 6 of oogenesis . At stage 6, they cease to undergo mitotic cycles and start endocycles. This transition is regulated by the Notch pathway . It has been demonstrated that Armi protein level decreases at this switch from mitosis to endoreplication owing to Notch signaling pathway activation . Immuno-histochemical experiments performed with Armi and Yb- antibodies on whole ovaries showed that not only is Armi protein level reduced in late stages of oogenesis, but also Yb staining. We observed a clear drop during oogenesis with a high level of Armi and Yb proteins only until stage 8 and a weak staining afterwards (Fig. 3b & Additional file 1: Figure S1) indicating that both proteins are presumably regulated at the transition from mitosis to endoreplication.
On the basis of these findings, we propose that two interconnected events occur during oogenesis that lead to a drop in Yb-body assembly in late stages. On the one hand, following Notch-signaling pathway activation in stage 6–7, the levels of Armi and Yb proteins are drastically reduced, which not only decreases the assembly of the Yb-bodies but also impedes the export of piRNA precursors (Fig. 4). On the other hand, the export of piRNA precursors is progressively reduced along oogenesis which further hampers the assembly of the remaining Armi and Yb into Yb-bodies.
Reduction of the assembly of Yb-bodies and of the export of flam piRNA precursors is thought to cause a decrease in the production of piRNAs in late stages of oogenesis. However, several studies indicate that the piRNA silencing is active throughout oogenesis. For example, if we consider the two retrotransposons, ZAM and gypsy, their enhancers are active at the posterior pole of the follicle cells throughout oogenesis including in late stages [26, 27]. Nevertheless, their transcripts are never detected in WT conditions owing to the silencing exerted by the piRNA pathway, which indicates that the silencing exerted on ZAM and gypsy is active even in late stages. One possible explanation of TE silencing in late stages of oogenesis when piRNA production seems impeded could be that the few and highly diminished Yb-bodies present in late stages give rise to a piRNA population that is sufficient to silence TEs. Alternatively, and not exclusively, piRNAs produced anteriorly in early stages are stable enough to remain active in late stages. Finally, it cannot be excluded that a transcriptional silencing exerted in early stages can still prevent transcription of the TEs in late stages with no need for piRNAs. The differential quantification of mature piRNAs produced in early versus late stages of oogenesis will provide a far better view of piRNAs produced during oogenesis.
From transcription to processing, multiple steps and numerous protein factors are required to drive piRNA precursors into the cytoplasmic structure where functional piRNAs are produced. In the follicle cells of Drosophila ovaries, RNAs transcribed from piRNA clusters are first spliced, presumably concomitantly to transcription , before being transferred throughout the nucleoplasm in an Exon Junction complex, UAP56 protein and Nxt1-Nxf1-dependent manner, to be assembled in a single nuclear focus [13, 16]. Then, the transfer to the cytoplasm requires the export complex Nxt1-Nxf1 and our present study suggests that Armi and Yb proteins may somehow be implicated in this process (Fig. 4). Armi protein is thought to be able to bind several types of RNAs being exported - including mRNAs. In the cytoplasm, its specific interaction with piRNA precursors is regulated by its ATPase hydrolysis activity and Yb protein [21, 25]. Our present study suggests that Armi could play an earlier role within the nucleus before RNA export. When in the cytoplasm, piRNA precursors are delivered to the Yb-bodies and mitochondria where Yb and Armi play distinct and collaborative roles to ensure the production of Zuc-dependent phased piRNAs [21, 25].
Our study shows that a spatially and temporally controlled piRNA biogenesis exists with two critical periods taking place before and after the switch from a mitotic cycle to an endo-replication cycle. It can be anticipated that the major pool of somatic piRNAs is produced during the first period when piRNA precursors exit from the nucleus and Yb-bodies are correctly assembled.
Overall, these data show that in addition to factors specifically required for piRNA biogenesis, the spatio-temporal regulation of the whole system takes place at another level of complexity, the understanding of which will certainly help to interpret delayed and unexpected regulations.
The used fly strains were: ISO1A from the collection of the GReD; armi /TM3 and armi [72.1]/TM6and RNAi line nxf1 (34945) from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center; RNAi lines: armi (103589KK) and yb (110056KK) from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Centre.
OSS cells were grown in prepared from Shields and Sang M3 Insect Medium (Sigma) supplemented with 0.6 mg/ml glutathione, 10 mU/ml insulin, 10% fetal bovine serum and 10% fly extract.
The DNA fragment to prepare the specific flam 508 probe to detect flam transcripts was PCR amplified from the ISO1A line using primers 5′-ATTCTCCTTTCTCAGGATGC-3′ and 5′-GCATTGCTACCTTACGTTTC-3′ and cloned into pGEMT easy vector.
Riboprobe was synthesized by digestion of pGEMT easy plasmids with NcoI or SpeI enzyme, followed by in vitro transcription using Sp6 or T7 polymerase and digoxygenin labeled UTP (Roche), DNAse I treatment and purification.
RNA FISH on ovaries was performed as previously described . In situ hybridization on OSS cells was carried out essentially described for ovaries. OSS cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBT (1X PBS, 0.1% Triton) at RT for 30 min, rinsed three times with PBT and post-fixed 10 min in 4% formaldehyde/PBT. After washes in PBT and permeabilisation (1 h in 1X PBS,0.3% Triton) prehybridization was done as follow: 10 min HYB- (50% Formamide, 5X SSC, 0.02% Tween)/PBT 1:1, 10 min HYB-, 1 h HYB+ (HYB- with yeast tRNA 0.5 μg/μl, 0.25 mg/ml heparin) at 37 °C. Ovaries were hybridized overnight at 37 °C with 1 μg riboprobe previously denaturated 10 min at 74 °C. Ovaries were then rinsed 20 min in HYB- and in HYB−/PBT at 37 °C then 4 times in PBT at RT before blocking 1 h at RT in TNB (Perkin-Elmer TSA kit) and immunodetection 1 h30 at RT with anti-Dig-HRP (Roche) in TNB 0.3% Triton. Cells were rinsed three times in PBT, incubated 10 min with TSA-Cy5 in amplification diluent (Perkin-Elmer) and rinsed three times in PBT.
When coupled to immunofluorescence, RNA straining was followed by incubation with mouse anti-lamin antibody (ADL67–10, Hybridoma), goat anti-Armitage antibody (sc-34,564, Santa Cruz), Yb antibody (kindly provided by G. Hannon), GAPDH antibody (IMG-5143A-050, Imgenex) Secondary antibodies coupled to Cy3 or Alexa-488 were used.
Ovaries from 2-to 4-days-old flies were dissected in PBT fixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBT at RT for 20 min, rinsed three times with PBT, incubated 1 h in PBS-0.3% Triton, rinsed three times with PBT and incubated 1 h in TNB 0,3% Triton prior staining with anti-lamin, anti-Armitage or anti- Yb antibody. Secondary antibodies coupled to Cy3, Cy-5 or Alexa-488 were used.
Three-dimensional images were acquired on Leica SP5 and Leica SP8 confocal microscopes using a 40X objective, acquiring a stack of at least 10 slices with an interval of 0,5 nm for each follicle to ensure signal detection within the entire volume of the follicle cells. Only cells acquired in their totality were considered for quantifications. Manual scoring was performed for the presence/absence of flam RNA signal in follicle cells (Fig. 1a) and for the localization of flam RNA probe signal compared to lamin signal (Figs. 1b, 2b and 4b). The presence/absence of Armi and Yb foci in each follicle cell was assessed manually (Fig. 3b).
We are grateful to R. Pillai for useful discussions; to A. Sarkar and J. Watts for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by Agence Nationale pour la Recherche, project Plastisipi to CV.
CD designed and performed experiments. CV conceived the study. CD EB and CV wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Aravin A, Gaidatzis D, Pfeffer S, Lagos-Quintana M, Landgraf P, Iovino N, et al. A novel class of small RNAs bind to MILI protein in mouse testes. Nature. 2006;442(7099):203–7 PubMed PMID: 16751777. Epub 2006/06/06. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brennecke J, Aravin AA, Stark A, Dus M, Kellis M, Sachidanandam R, et al. Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell. 2007;128(6):1089–103 PubMed PMID: 17346786. Epub 2007/03/10. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Girard A, Sachidanandam R, Hannon GJ, Carmell MA. A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins. Nature. 2006;442(7099):199–202 PubMed PMID: 16751776. Epub 2006/06/06. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aravin AA, Hannon GJ, Brennecke J. The Piwi-piRNA pathway provides an adaptive defense in the transposon arms race. Science. 2007;318(5851):761–4 PubMed PMID: 17975059. Epub 2007/11/03. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zanni V, Eymery A, Coiffet M, Zytnicki M, Luyten I, Quesneville H, et al. Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(49):19842–7 PubMed PMID: 24248389. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3856796. Epub 2013/11/20. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saito K, Inagaki S, Mituyama T, Kawamura Y, Ono Y, Sakota E, et al. A regulatory circuit for piwi by the large Maf gene traffic jam in Drosophila. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1296–9 PubMed PMID: 19812547. Epub 2009/10/09. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goriaux C, Theron E, Brasset E, Vaury C. History of the discovery of a master locus producing piRNAs: the flamenco/COM locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Front Genet. 2014;5:257 PubMed PMID: 25136352. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4120762. Epub 2014/08/20. eng.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goriaux C, Desset S, Renaud Y, Vaury C, Brasset E. Transcriptional properties and splicing of the flamenco piRNA cluster. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(4):411–8 PubMed PMID: 24562610. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3989672. Epub 2014/02/25. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi H, Watanabe T, Ku HY, Liu N, Zhong M, Lin H. The Yb body, a major site for Piwi-associated RNA biogenesis and a gateway for Piwi expression and transport to the nucleus in somatic cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(5):3789–97 PubMed PMID: 21106531. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3030380. Epub 2010/11/26. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szakmary A, Reedy M, Qi H, Lin H. The Yb protein defines a novel organelle and regulates male germline stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(4):613–27 PubMed PMID: 19433453. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2711570. Epub 2009/05/13. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishizu H, Siomi H, Siomi MC. Biology of PIWI-interacting RNAs: new insights into biogenesis and function inside and outside of germlines. Genes Dev. 2012;26(21):2361–73 PubMed PMID: 23124062. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3489994. Epub 2012/11/06. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siomi MC, Sato K, Pezic D, Aravin AA. PIWI-interacting small RNAs: the vanguard of genome defence. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(4):246–58 PubMed PMID: 21427766. Epub 2011/03/24. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dennis C, Zanni V, Brasset E, Eymery A, Zhang L, Mteirek R, et al. “Dot COM”, a nuclear transit center for the primary piRNA pathway in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e72752 PubMed PMID: 24039799. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3767702. Epub 2013/09/17. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murota Y, Ishizu H, Nakagawa S, Iwasaki YW, Shibata S, Kamatani MK, et al. Yb integrates piRNA intermediates and processing factors into perinuclear bodies to enhance piRISC assembly. Cell Rep. 2014;8(1):103–13 PubMed PMID: 24953657. Epub 2014/06/24. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niki Y, Yamaguchi T, Mahowald AP. Establishment of stable cell lines of Drosophila germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(44):16325–30 PubMed PMID: 17056713. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1637581. Epub 2006/10/24. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dennis C, Brasset E, Sarkar A, Vaury C. Export of piRNA precursors by EJC triggers assembly of cytoplasmic Yb-body in Drosophila. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13739 PubMed PMID: 27929060. Pubmed Central PMCID: 5155165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deng WM, Althauser C, Ruohola-Baker H. Notch-Delta signaling induces a transition from mitotic cell cycle to endocycle in Drosophila follicle cells. Development. 2001;128(23):4737–46 PubMed PMID: 11731454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olivieri D, Sykora MM, Sachidanandam R, Mechtler K, Brennecke J. An in vivo RNAi assay identifies major genetic and cellular requirements for primary piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2010;29(19):3301–17 PubMed PMID: 20818334. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2957214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishizu H, Iwasaki YW, Hirakata S, Ozaki H, Iwasaki W, Siomi H, et al. Somatic primary piRNA biogenesis driven by cis-acting RNA elements and trans-acting Yb. Cell Rep. 2015;12(3):429–40 PubMed PMID: 26166564. Epub 2015/07/15. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saito K, Ishizu H, Komai M, Kotani H, Kawamura Y, Nishida KM, et al. Roles for the Yb body components Armitage and Yb in primary piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2010;24(22):2493–8 PubMed PMID: 20966047. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2975925. Epub 2010/10/23. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishizu H, Kinoshita T, Hirakata S, Komatsuzaki C, Siomi MC. Distinct and collaborative functions of Yb and Armitage in transposon-targeting piRNA biogenesis. Cell Rep. 2019;27(6):1822–35 e8. PubMed PMID: 31067466.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirakata S, Ishizu H, Fujita A, Tomoe Y, Siomi MC. Requirements for multivalent Yb body assembly in transposon silencing in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 2019. PubMed PMID: 31040109.Google Scholar
- Rogers AK, Situ K, Perkins EM, Toth KF. Zucchini-dependent piRNA processing is triggered by recruitment to the cytoplasmic processing machinery. Genes Dev. 2017;31(18):1858–69 PubMed PMID: 29021243. Pubmed Central PMCID: 5695087.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pandey RR, Homolka D, Chen KM, Sachidanandam R, Fauvarque MO, Pillai RS. Recruitment of Armitage and Yb to a transcript triggers its phased processing into primary piRNAs in Drosophila ovaries. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(8):e1006956 PubMed PMID: 28827804. Pubmed Central PMCID: 5578672.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ge DT, Wang W, Tipping C, Gainetdinov I, Weng Z, Zamore PD. The RNA-binding ATPase, Armitage, couples piRNA amplification in Nuage to phased piRNA production on mitochondria. Mol Cell. 2019;74(5):982–95.e6. PubMed PMID: 31076285.Google Scholar
- Leblanc P, Desset S, Giorgi F, Taddei AR, Fausto AM, Mazzini M, et al. Life cycle of an endogenous retrovirus, ZAM, in Drosophila melanogaster. J Virol. 2000;74(22):10658–69 PubMed PMID: 11044110. Pubmed Central PMCID: 110940. Epub 2000/10/24. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pelisson A, Song SU, Prud'homme N, Smith PA, Bucheton A, Corces VG. Gypsy transposition correlates with the production of a retroviral envelope-like protein under the tissue-specific control of the Drosophila flamenco gene. EMBO J. 1994;13(18):4401–11 PubMed PMID: 7925283. Pubmed Central PMCID: 395367. Epub 1994/09/15. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar