Open Access

Globular domain structure and function of restriction-like-endonuclease LINEs: similarities to eukaryotic splicing factor Prp8

Mobile DNA20178:16

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-017-0097-9

Received: 9 August 2017

Accepted: 17 October 2017

Published: 7 November 2017

Abstract

Background

R2 elements are a clade of early branching Long Interspersed Elements (LINEs). LINEs are retrotransposable elements whose replication can have profound effects on the genomes in which they reside. No crystal or EM structures exist for the reverse transcriptase (RT) and linker regions of LINEs.

Results

Using limited proteolysis as a probe for globular domain structure, we show that the protein encoded by the Bombyx mori R2 element has two major globular domains: (1) a small globular domain consisting of the N-terminal zinc finger and Myb motifs, and (2) a large globular domain consisting of the RT, linker, and type II restriction-like endonuclease (RLE). Further digestion of the large globular domain occurred within the RT. Mapping these RT cleavages onto an updated model of the R2Bm RT indicated that the thumb of the RT was largely protected from proteolytic cleavage. The crystal structure of the large globular domain of Prp8, a eukaryotic splicing factor, was a major template used in building the R2Bm RT model, particularly the thumb region. The large fragment of Prp8 consists not only of a RT similar to R2Bm, but also an RLE and a linker connecting the two regions. The linker sequences adjacent to the RLE in LINEs and Prp8 share a set of two important α-helices and a (presumptive) knuckle/ββα structural motif that are closely associated with the thumb. The RLEs of LINEs and Prp8 share a unique catalytic core residue spacing as well as other key residues.

Conclusions

The protein encoded by RLE LINEs consists of two major globular domains. The larger of the two globular domain contains the RT, linker, and RLE and is similar to the large fragment of the spliceosomal protein Prp8. The similarities are suggestive of possible common ancestry.

Keywords

Transposable element (TE)LineNon-LTR retrotransposonTarget primed reverse transcription (TPRT)Reverse transcriptaseRNA splicing

Background

Long INterspersed Elements (LINEs), also called non-LTR retrotransposons, are a major class of retrotransposable elements. LINEs package their transcribed RNA into ribonucleoprotein particles (RNP) using element encoded proteins translated from the mRNA being packaged. LINEs insert their genetic material back into the host genome at a new location by target primed reverse transcription (TPRT) [15]. TPRT is initiated by cleavage of one of the target chromosomal strands by an element encoded DNA endonuclease. The free 3′-OH DNA end generated by the DNA endonuclease is used to prime reverse transcription of the element RNA, thus inserting a new DNA copy of element into the host genome.

All LINEs are believed to require the same basic activities to integrate: RNA binding activity, DNA binding activity, DNA endonuclease activity, reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, and completion of integration by second strand synthesis. There are two major groups of LINEs. The two groups share a common RT and a IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle. The two groups differ in their open reading frame (ORF) structures, RNA binding domains, DNA binding domains, and DNA endonuclease domains used to form the element RNP and to integrate into the host DNA.

The earlier branching group has a single ORF. The ORF encodes a multifunctional protein with N-terminal zinc finger and Myb motifs, an RT, a gag-knuckle like motif, and a type II restriction-like endonuclease (RLE) with a restriction endonuclease like fold (REL) (reviewed in [6, 7]). This group of LINEs is generally site-specific during integration. The insect R2 element is a well-studied example of this early branching LINE group.

The later branching group has two open reading frames. The second open reading is similar to that of the earlier branching group. It encodes an apurinic-apyrimidinic family endonuclease (APE), a RT, and the gag knuckle-like motif (reviewed in [812]). The mammalian L1 element is a well-studied example of this later branching LINE group.

While crystal structures exist for the APE endonuclease and for the protein product of the first ORF of APE LINEs, no crystal or cryo-EM structures exist for the RLE LINEs, nor for the regions common between the two groups of LINEs [1318]. Our previous paper reported a protein threading model for the restriction-like endonuclease of R2 elements [19]. This paper reports the globular domain structure of R2Bm as probed by limited proteolysis. An updated model of the R2 RT is also presented along with an analysis of the linker region between the RT and the endonuclease. The R2 proteolytic data, in conjunction with sequence-structure alignments of the RT, linker, and RLE, indicate that RLE LINEs share a number of commonalities with the large fragment of Prp8, a highly conserved eukaryotic splicing factor that has a RT domain and an RLE domain, beyond those already discovered and discussed [2022].

Results

Mapping and sequencing LysC protease resistant fragments of R2Bm protein

In order to probe the globular domain structure of R2Bm, R2Bm protein was subjected to limited proteolysis by one of several proteases. LysC, which cleaves on the C-terminal side of lysine residues, was one of these proteases. There are 42 lysine residues in the expressed and purified R2Bm protein. Aliquots from the digestion reaction were pulled at different time points and the reactions terminated. The digestion profile of R2 protein cleaved by LysC at the different time points were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1a). At least nine major bands (LA-LI) were observed. Some of these bands appeared early in the time course (e.g., LA, LC, LF, and LG), while other bands appeared at later time points (e.g., LE, LH, and LI). Collectively, these bands represent protease resistant R2Bm fragments. The protease resistant fragments were excised from the gel, acetylated, and then digested to completion with trypsin. The peptides resulting from the trypsin digest were sequenced by nano-LC-ESI mass spectrometry. The original N-terminal end(s) of the protease resistant fragment (i.e., those ends resulting from LysC cleavage) were identifiable as they had been acetylated. The N-terminal ends resulting from LysC cleavage in bands LA-LI are reported in Fig. 1b. The y and b ion series that allowed the N-terminal peptide identification are given. The MS/MS spectrum in support of the peptide identification are provided in the Additional file 1: S1A. The internal peptides resulting from further trypsin cleavage of the LysC resistant bands were similarly sequenced by MS/MS (Additional file 1: S1B).
Fig. 1

Mapping and sequencing LysC protease resistant fragments of R2Bm protein. a R2Bm protein was digested with LysC protease and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Major observed bands were designated LA-LI. The triangle represents a time course of LysC digestion. The molecular weight (MW) marker values are given. b Identification of proteolytic fragments of R2Bm protein. Bands from panel A were cut out, further processed, and analyzed by nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS sequencing. The N-terminal of the band producing fragment was identified by acetylation. Internal peptides were sequenced as well. The y and b ions that identified the N-terminal end are indicated. Symbols: * = acetylation; @ = oxidation;! = carbamidomethylation. The spectrum is given in the supplemental data. c Map of the band purified R2Bm fragments. A detailed diagram of the R2Bm open reading frame (ORF) is given along with an amino acid ruler. The boundaries of the R2Bm proteolytic resistant fragments LA-LI are mapped below, along with the amino acid and primary sequence position of the first amino acid of the fragment. The C-terminal ends were not exactly pinpointed but were roughly determined using the apparent MW from the SDS-PAGE gel and by the coverage of internal peptides sequenced by nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS. The major earliest and latest appearing gel bands are roughly grouped together in the map. Abbreviations: zinc finger (ZF) and restriction-like endonuclease (RLE)

The approximate C-terminal end of LysC protease resistant fragments LA-LI were determined by sequencing of the internal peptides and by the apparent molecular weight of the original protease resistant bands on SDS PAGE gels given the experimentally determined N-terminal end. The peptide sequencing data derived from bands LA-LI have been mapped back onto the linear domain structure of R2Bm and are summarized in Fig. 1c. A more detailed amino acid break down of the different subdomains of the R2Bm ORF can be found in Additional file 2: S6 and in Fig. 5. Please note that the ORF and numbering is for the R2 protein generated from our R2 protein expression construct (ΔNR2Bm) which is slightly amino-terminally truncated compared to the genbank entry for R2Bm.

Full-length R2Bm (118 kD) was quickly processed by LysC to form a large ~89 kD LA band and shorter ~29 kD LF and ~22 kD LG bands. The LF band was found to have a fragment with alternative N-terminal ends that mapped near the beginning of the R2Bm ORF, at amino acid residues four and seven—a serine (S4) and a glutamic acid (E7), respectively. Internal peptides of the LF fragment included the ZF and Myb domains and ended within −1, a conserved basic region involved in RNA binding [23]. The fragment from band LG was similar to the LF fragment, except that fragment LG was ~60 amino acids shorter. Fragment LG had an N-terminal end that mapped to amino acid R64 of the R2Bm ORF, removing most of the ZF from the fragment. The C-terminal end of the LG fragment appeared to be similar to LF.

The polypeptide that constituted the large ~89 kD LA band had two alternative N-terminal ends, R242 and C256. The LA fragment spanned from −1 to the end of the ORF. The LA fragment contained the entire RT, the endonuclease, and the linker region connecting the RT and endonuclease domains.

Another large prominent band appeared along with band LA at the earlier time points: band LC. The fragment from band LC consisted of part of the RT, starting within RT6, at amino acids S595 and H609, and ending at the end of the R2Bm ORF. Like the LA fragment, the LC fragment contained the endonuclease domain in addition to the RT.

Band LB was present at low amounts across the time series in Fig. 1a. At different protease ratios, however, band LB was only prominent at earlier time points (data not shown). Fragment LB had about 30 more amino acids of the RT than did fragment LC. Fragment LB is likely processed into fragment LC.

At later time points, fragments LA, LB, and LC were further processed. Band LD consisted of two non-overlapping fragments, LD(i) and LD(ii), of about the same size. In the 18% gel the LD fragments ran as a single band, while on the gradient gel a doublet was observed (Fig. 1a). The first LD fragment, LD(i), consisted of the bulk of the RT, from V385, which was located in RT1, through most of the thumb. The second LD fragment, LD(ii) started near the end of the thumb at amino acid A719 and continued through the end of the ORF. Fragment LD(ii) contained the endonuclease and the linker region that connects the endonuclease to the RT.

Fragment LC gets cleaved at K763 to generate bands LE and LI. Band LI consisted of the N-terminal portion of fragment LC with an N-terminal end of H609. The fragment in band LE had an N-terminal end of S764 and contained the linker and RLE. Band LE was a major late appearing band that accumulated over time. Fragments LC and LD(ii) are likely both processed into fragment LE.

Band LH consisted of a fragment with an N-terminal end located at the beginning of the Myb domain at amino acid R82. The polypeptide appeared to be derived from fragments LF and/or LG but was further truncated at the N-terminal end.

As fragments from the RT and the ZF/Myb regions of the ORF were processed into smaller polypeptides, those polypeptides became difficult to resolve and visualize on SDS-PAGE, especially on preparative gels. Depending upon the gel percentage and band location, an excised gel slice can still contain signal from bands just above or below that area. In the later time points, the background between bands increases due to non-banding polypeptides. We did not trust our ability to identify bands and N-terminal ends below about 18 kD.

Mapping and sequencing of GluC protease resistant fragments of R2Bm protein

The second protease used to probe globular domain structure of R2Bm was GluC. GluC cleaves on the C-terminal side of glutamic acid residues, and to a lesser extent (100-fold) on aspartic acid residues. There are 69 glutamic acid residues and 47 aspartic acid residues in the R2Bm protein. Aliquots were pulled from the digestion reaction at different time points and terminated. The digestion profile of R2Bm protein cleaved by GluC at the different time points was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2a). The protease resistant bands visualized on the SDS-PAGE were labeled GA-GK. The A-K designators, however, do not necessarily equate to an equivalent LysC resistant R2 fragment, as the designators are by order of apparent-molecular-weight and not by R2 ORF region. The protease resistant fragments were excised from the gel, processed, and sequenced by nano-LC-ESI mass spectrometry. The y and b ion series that allowed the N-terminal peptide identification are given for each band (Fig. 2b and Additional file 3: S2). A map of the internal peptides found in each band are reported in Additional file 4: S3.
Fig. 2

Mapping and sequencing GluC protease resistant fragments of R2Bm protein. Symbols and abbreviations are as in Fig. 1. a R2Bm protein was digested with GluC protease and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Major observed bands were designated GA-GK. b Identification of proteolytic fragments of R2Bm protein. Bands from panel A were cut out, further processed, and analyzed by nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS sequencing. The N-terminal of the band producing fragment was identified by acetylation. c Map of the band purified R2Bm fragments. The major GluC generated R2Bm fragments detected in panel A are mapped below the ORF diagram and rulers. d Heatmap of GluC cleavages found in non-fractionated digestion reactions of R2Bm protein across time. Each column of boxes represents a GluC cleavage site. GluC cleaves after an E residue, indicated by a dot above the column, or a D residue (no dot). The positions of the amino terminal ends generated by observable GluC cleavages are given below the boxes. The number of peptide spectral matches (# PSM) are color coded as shown in the key. The R2Bm ORF is diagramed below the heatmap. Each row is a different time point, with the top row being the zero time point (no GluC) and the bottom row being eight hours. The triangle represents increasing time of GluC digestion

GluC, like LysC, quickly cleaved the R2Bm protein into a large fragment of about 87 kD (band GA) and a small fragment of about 30 kD (band GH). The large fragment, GA, consisted of the RT, the linker, and the RLE (Fig. 2c). The small fragment consisted of the N-terminal region of the R2Bm protein. The protein fragments isolated from bands GB-GF were, to a first approximation, further truncations of the GA fragment, where the truncating cleavages were located within the RT. The most prominent of these fragments and bands were GC, GE, and GF. Bands GE and GF appeared late in the time course. The fragments isolated from bands GJ and GK were, to a first approximation, further truncations of band GH. As band GH disappeared, band GJ became more prominent. As band GJ disappeared, band GK appeared. The two bands marked GG were prominent on the 18% acrylamide gel because of a band compression artifact. The GG area contained faint bands and a diffuse smear on the gradient gel. The lower of the two bands appeared to be GluC, while the upper band could not be ascertained. Band GI also could not be ascertained.

There were a number of alternative N-terminal ends found for fragment GA: L252, M279, T281, and A300 (Fig. 2b, c). Fragments GH and GJ also were found to have several alternative N-terminal ends: N8, A12, and R21. In order to aid in interpreting the N-terminal ends of the protease resistant R2Bm fragments (especially early and late cleavage determinations) and to attain a more comprehensive accounting of cleavages that did not give rise to readily observable bands, an experiment was performed where GluC cleavages were detected at a given time point without separating individual proteolytic fragments. Instead of fractionating the fragments, the terminated protease reaction was run into the SDS-PAGE gel for only a few millimeters. A fairly large section of gel near the wells was then excised and processed for cleavage detection (Fig. 2d). This technique of running the reaction minimally into the gel is a near equivalent to direct detection in solution (i.e., no gel fractionation). For technical reasons (see materials and methods), however, it was necessary to have the proteolysis reaction processed through a gel slice. Each column of boxes below the ORF map is a potential GluC cleavage site (D/E), or rather the amino acids immediately following a GluC cleavage site that would become acetylated if the preceding D or E residue were cleaved. Each progressive row is a (longer) time point with identified cleavages reported as a heat map of peptide spectral match (psm) values for each site for each time point. In the heatmap data, there appeared to have been several pre-existing R2Bm N-terminal ends present in the R2Bm protein preparation as N-terminal signals at positions P36, P185, and S786 were detected in the zero time point on the heatmap. No major bands on the SDS-page gels, however, were attributable to these fragments.

Comparing the heatmap results (Fig. 2d) with the data derived from the SDS-PAGE bands (Fig. 2b) provided an extra window into the relative cleavability and timing of several important cleavage sites. It appeared that the major early cleavage events were near the start of the RT. Cleavage at E278 was the most robust cleavage event and gave rise to fragments GA and GH. The cleavage event in domain −1 at position E251 was also a major cleavage event. Cleavage at E251 peaked midway through the digestion reaction as band GJ become prominent. Cleavage at E251 occurred in the full protein as well as in a C-terminal truncation of fragment GH. The T281 and A300 N-terminal ends of band GA appeared to be the result of later cleavage events (at E280 and E299, respectively) that further truncated the original GA fragment.

Another major cleavage event in Fig. 2d was an early event located at E507. Amino acid E507 is within RT4, and cleavage at this location resulted fragment GC. Two other prominent cleavage locations in Fig. 2d, E614 and E649, were later cleavage events and gave rise to fragments GE and GF, respectively. Amino acid E614 is located in RT6, and E649 is located at the beginning of the thumb of the RT. The N-terminal ends of fragments GC and GF were confirmed by Edman degradation (data not shown). Other cleavages were observed within the RT in Fig. 2d, not all of which gave rise to major stable fragments visible on the SDS-PAGE gel. Interior RT fragments (i.e., those not associated with the linker and RLE) were either heterogeneous in nature or unstable such that bands were not observed on an SDS-PAGE gel.

The N-terminal ends of the GH and GJ fragments, like GA, were ragged. The GH and GJ fragments had N-terminal ends of N8, A12, and R21. While all three positions were robust in Fig. 2d, cleavage at E11 to generate the A12 end was the most prominent. It should be noted, however, that the original N-terminal end of the R2 protein was not tracked as the combination of proteases used in generating the peptides for MS/MS sequencing generated peptides too small to be readily detected. There was likely a time dependent shortening of the N-terminal ends in the E7-E50 region of the GH to GJ to GK progression that we were unable to fully quantify. A list of all cleavage sites and early/late data is given in Additional file 5: S7.

Protein threading model of the R2Bm RT and mapping of the protease cleavages onto the model

It has been nearly 20 years since a model of the R2 RT has been generated using homology modeling and protein threading [24]. The updated RT model shown in Fig. 3 (and Additional file 6: S4) was constructed using the Phyre 2.0 protein modeling server [25]. The model spanned amino acid residues Y246-P754 of the expressed ΔNR2Bm protein and spanned from the end of −1 through the thumb of the RT [19]. The initial residues, Y246-E263, and the final residues, R736-P754, were modeled ab initio by the modeling program. Residues V264-V735, however, were modeled with high homology confidence using four known protein structures as templates: 5hhl (chain A), 5g2X (chain C), 4i43 (chain B) and 1khv (chain A) (Fig. 3a) [21, 22, 26, 27]. The first two templates are group II intron RTs: the cryo-EM structure of lactococcal group II intron LtrA protein and the crystal structure of the Eubacterium rectale group II intron RT. The third template is the RT found in the eukaryotic splicing factor Prp8. The fourth template is the caliciviral RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Only the high confidence regions of the R2Bm RT were kept in the final model; the ab initio regions were deleted from the 3D depictions presented in Figs. 3b-e.
Fig. 3

Modeling of the R2Bm RT domain and mapping of the proteolytic cleavages onto the RT model. a R2Bm RT model construction and confidence report from Phyre2. 5hhl: crystal structure of the RT domain of the group II intron encoded protein from Eubacterium rectale. 5g2xC: the maturase protein in the cryo-EM structures of a spliced Lactococcus lactis group II A intron RNP. 4i43B: the splicing factor Prp8 protein large domain crystal structure. 1khv: the crystal structure of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. b Ribbon model representation of R2Bm RT with several key regions highlighted. The pinky finger (RT0) is colored red, as is the middle finger of RT4. The region spanning from a portion of the −1 to RT0 is in yellow. This region includes a remnant of the −1 loop, the index finger α-helix, and the α-helix that traverses palm. The ring finger (RT1) is in blue, as is the RT2 α-helix. c Coulombic surface rendering of the R2Bm model. d Early proteolytic cleavage sites mapped onto the R2Bm RT model. Dark green coloring marks glutamic acid and aspartic acid residues that were cleaved. Pale green marks glutamic acid and aspartic acid residues that were not cleaved. Pink coloring marks lysine residues that were cleaved. Pale purple marks lysine residues that were not cleaved: See key in panel E. e Early plus later proteolytic cleavage sites mapped onto the R2Bm RT model. Markings are as in panel D

The region between −1 and RT0 (V264-P322) was modeled solely from the RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) but was of high confidence. The region from RT0 through RT2a (I323-R449) was built using the two group II intron RTs and the RNA dependent RNA polymerase. The RT3-RT6 area (K450-L602) was modeled using the group II intron structures, RNA dependent RNA polymerase, and Prp8. The area between RT6 and RT7 was modeled only from Prp8. RT7 was modeled by the group II intron structures as well as Prp8. The thumb was modeled using only the Prp8 crystal structure as a template.

A ribbon diagram of the R2Bm RT model is presented in Fig. 3b. The R2Bm RT assumed the canonical hand-like configuration, with fingers, palm, and thumb regions, and was overall similar to RdRP [2831]. A word of caution is warranted, homology models are not crystal or cryo-EM structures. The models are comparatively quite crude and resemble their individual templates. That said, homology modeling tools have improved greatly and model with high confidence can be quite informative when one lacks a high resolution structure. The thumb region (1305-1375) was very long and prominent in R2Bm. The −1, index finger (276-288), and middle finger formed one of two bulbous regions as in RdRP. The pinky finger (RT0) formed the second bulbous region. Just behind the index and middle finger was the ring finger (RT1 β-strands). The RT2 α-helix was positioned behind RT0. The region spanning from −1 to RT0 (yellow in the ribbon diagram) includes the index finger (276-288) and the palm-traversing α-helix (298-314).

The index finger and RT0 are connected by the palm traversing α-helix, a feature shared between RdRP, Prp8, and, apparently, LINE polymerases. Telomerases have the index finger α-helix but lack RT0 (the pinky finger) as well as the palm-traversing α-helix (structural overlays of R2Bm RT with PDB ID 3du5 data not shown) [32]. In group II intron RTs, the index finger and palm traversing helix are not present (PDB ID 5hhl and 5g2x) [22, 26]. Group II intron RTs do, however, have an RT0 and an extension to the RT0 termed NTD, both positioned on the pinky finger side [22, 26].

The index finger region is important for the polymerization functions. A monoclonal antibody directed against the vicinity of the index finger of the hepatitis C virus RdRP was found to inhibit both primer-dependent and de novo RNA synthesis [33].

The pinky finger region is also important for polymerization. The RT0 of R2Bm and group II intron RTs share a set of antiparallel α-helices connected by a loop [22, 26, 34, 35]. In RdRP the RT0 homologue is the “G-loop,” or “motif G.” The G-loop functions in template-RNA binding and translocation [28, 36]. A monoclonal antibody directed against the G-loop was found to be inhibitory to primer-dependent RNA synthesis but not de novo RNA synthesis [33]. The RT0 domain of RLE LINEs contains a PGPD motif in the loop. The PGPD motif, when mutated in R2Bm, abolished template jumping activity of the RT and reduced, to some extent, overall polymerization activity [23]. Template jumping activity is also observed in RdRP, Mauriceville retroplasmid, and group II intron RTs [3739]. Mutation of the PGPD motif in R2Bm also reduced the binding to the 5′ and 3′ PBM RNAs [23]. The group II intron protein’s RT0 and its extension (the NTD) are involved in binding DIVa of the group II intron RNA [22, 40, 41]. The interaction between RT0 and DIVa is required for positioning the intronic-RNA-template for reverse transcription (TPRT), but it is not strictly essential for splicing [40].

RLE LINEs, telomerase, and group II introns possess RNA binding domains upstream (N-terminal) of the reverse transcriptase. In the case of the group II intron protein, the N-terminal domain is an extension of RT0 and resides on that side of the RT (the pinky finger side). The extended RT0 and IFD bind to DIVa of the intron RNA [22, 40]. In R2, the RNA binding domain −1 is on the opposite side of the fingers from RT0. The remnants of domain −1 is on the index finger side. Mutations in −1 abolished 5′ and 3′ PBM RNA binding [23]. Telomerases also contain an RNA binding region upstream of the RT that is involved in binding RNA [32, 42, 43].

A coulombic surface map is presented in Fig. 3c. The R2Bm RT adopts an overall shape of a curved wedge with the backside of the thumb being the sharp edge. One of the two comparatively flat sides is the thumb-to-RT0 face. This face has a small central acidic patch surrounded by mostly hydrophobic residues in the model. The other fairly flat side is the thumb to index finger side and is predominantly basic. The third side is rounded. It spans from the index finger to RT0 and has a central vertical streak of acidic residues running through a central streak of (mostly) hydrophobic residues. The streaks are centered below the ring finger. The hydrophobic regions, and perhaps the acidic patches/streaks within them, are potential areas of further protein-protein interactions.

The R2Bm RT model was used for mapping the earlier cleavages (Fig. 3d) as well as all of the cleavages (early plus later, Fig. 3e) for both LysC and GluC proteases. LysC cleaves on the C-terminal side of K residues. There are 18 K residues in the R2Bm RT model, six of which are cleaved to some degree. Cleavage in the ab initio regions are included in the cleavage count, although the ab initio sequences have been deleted from the 3D models in the figure. GluC cleaves on the C-terminal of E residues and much less often on the C-terminal side of D residues. There are 30 E residues in the R2Bm RT, 14 of which are cleaved to some degree. There are 26 D residues in the RT, six of which are weakly cleaved. Most of the early cleavages mapped to the −1 ab initio regions (not shown), the index finger, and the tip of the middle finger. There was also a cleavage on the basic face between the thumb and −1. Some of the next cleavages were also on the basic face as well as on the RT0 protrusion and on the knife edge (the backside) of the thumb. Most of the prominent thumb was protected from cleavage. Later cleavages were found on the secondary structures just behind where the first cleavages were (i.e., the regions behind the index finger α-helix) and on the flat hydrophobic thumb-to-RT0 face inside the acidic patch.

The large fragment of the eukaryotic splicing factor Prp8 and restriction-like endonuclease bearing LINEs share a common set of sequence motifs and structure

RTs share a common set of sequence domains, numbered 1-7, and a thumb region [34, 35, 4447]. The thumb usually contains a three-helix bundle. In addition to the thumb and RT1 through RT7, the RT of LINEs contains insertions: 0, 2a, 3a, and 6a. Several of these insertions are present in other eukaryotic RTs (Additional file 7: S5A-D and [34, 35, 4446]). The RT domain of Prp8 is very similar to that of LINEs, having 0, 2a, 3a, 4a, and 6a insertions. The telomerase RT encodes 2a, and 3a. The RT of group II intron proteins encodes 0, 2a, 3a, 4a, and 7a.

The area between the reverse transcriptase and the RLE in RLE LINEs is the linker region. The linker in RLE LINEs was predicted to be predominantly α-helical with six major helices, with some groups having 2-3 additional helices (Additional file 7: S5). A weak scoring helix also was often observed in the highly-conserved (presumptive) gag-knuckle (see below). The region downstream of the RT in APE LINEs were more diverse, with 5 -14 predicted helical regions. The crystal structure and EM-structures of Prp8 have about 13 helices. β-strands were less prevalent in the linker of RLE LINEs than in APE LINEs (about 0-2 vs 4-6). Among the RLE LINEs, only Utopia may contain comparatively high number of linker β-strands. Several clades of APE LINEs encode an RNaseH domain downstream of the RT (reviewed in [9]).

A multiple alignment and Ali2D secondary structure prediction is presented for the most conserved portion of the linker for RLE LINEs, APE LINEs, and Prp8 (Fig. 4a). Near the end of the linker region of RLE LINEs is the highly conserved IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle motif with a spacing of CX2-3CX7-8HX4C (Fig. 4a). In R2Bm the IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle is located at amino acids 863-883. The spacing of the cysteines and histidine in the motif is similar to that of IAP domains, although a bit smaller, or gag-knuckles, although a bit larger [48]. IAP domains form a ββα structure around zinc ion [48]. A gag-knuckle is β-strand followed by a knuckle (a sharp turn) with a less structured finish (e.g., coil with bends) [48]. The zinc ion is coordinated by the C and H residues of the motif [48]. The β-strands and α-helix are generally short. The canonical structure for an IAP domain is indicated above the R2Bm sequence listed in Fig. 4a as is the predicted (Ali2D) secondary structure for the linker region of RLE LINEs. For many RLE LINEs a short α-helix was predicted near the H residue (Additional file 7: S5). A β-strand was occasionally predicted near the first C residue using JPRED for RLE LINEs (data not shown). In many of the RLE LINE clades (e.g., R2, Dong, NeSL, and Utopia) there was a conserved R residue (R867) between the first two C residues.
Fig. 4

Structure based alignments of linker and RLE regions. a Multiple sequence alignment and Ali2D prediction of the most conserved region of the linker. The Ali2D predicted secondary for R2Bm protein are marked above the R2Bm sequence. The canonical ββα structure of a gag-knuckle/IAP is also presented. The secondary structure of Prp8 is given below the Prp8 sequences. The Prp8 secondary structures are from several reported crystal and cryo-EM structures: 3JCM, 5LJ3, 4i43B. Rounded bars are α-helices and arrows are β-strands. b Multiple sequence alignment RLE from LINEs, type II restriction enzymes, archeal Holliday junction resolvases, influenza PA endonuclease, and Prp8. Abbreviations: R2Bm = Bombyx mori (M16558.1); R2Lp = Limulus polyphemus (AF015814.1); R2Dr = Danio rario (34392533); R8Hm = Hydra magnipapillata; R9Av = Adenata vaga (ACV95454.1); R4Pe = Parascaris equorum (AAB02297.1); DongFr = Fugu rubripes; CRE2Cf = Crithidia fasciculata; ZARTc = Trypanosoma cruzi; HERODr = Danio rario; HEROBf = Branchiostoma floridae; NeSLTv = Trichomonas vaginalis; NeSLAc = Acanthamoeba castellanii; UtopAm = Alligator mississippiensis Utopia; UtopCp = Crocodylus porosus Utopia; Prp8Hs = Homo sapiens (NP_006436.3); Prp8Dm = Drosophila melangaster (NP_610735.1); Prp8At = Arabidopsis thaliana (Q9T0I6); Prp8Sc = Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P33334); Prp8Sp = Schizosaccharomyces pombe (O14187); PA En = Influenza virus PA endonclease (3HW4). R8Hm, DongFr, CRE2Cf, CZARTc, HERODr, HEROBf, NeSLTv, NeSLAc, UtopAm, and UtopCp sequences were collected from Repbase [69]. Holiday junction resolvases Ssol Hje (1ob8) and Ssol Hjc (1hh1) are from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Holiday junction resolvase Stok Hjc (2eo0) is from Sulfolobus tokodaii str. 7 Pfur Hjc (1gef) is from Pyrococcus furiosus

APE LINEs, although lacking a downstream RLE, have a linker region that also ends with the IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle. For APE LINEs, the area near the H was often predicted to be a β-strand.

It is not clear if Prp8 had a IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle at one time or not. No CCHC motif exist in Prp8. Where the knuckle would be is not reliably aligned by sequence alignment programs to the LINE IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle, or rather that there are several ways to align the region. In Fig. 4a, the CX2-3C (866-810 of R2Bm) of the zinc knuckle motif has been aligned with NRAN(1615-1620) in Prp8. In this configuration the R(1616) of Prp8 aligns to a conserved R found at the start of the zinc knuckle (R867 in R2Bm) in a number of the RLE LINEs. Residue 1620 (Y) in Prp8 then aligns with the conserved Y in Utopia (position 870 in R2Bm). In Prp8 there are two conserved H residues which could potentially line up with the H of the LINE CCHC motif: H1635 and H1652. In Fig. 4a we aligned the H1635 to the H of the LINE CCHC motif as H1652 was too close to the endonuclease. An alternative and perhaps better method of aligning Prp8 and LINEs in this area is by structure. Prp8 contains a non-zinc knuckle with a ββα structure that is positioned at 1624-1647. The Prp8 non-zinc knuckle might be a structural equivalent to the LINE IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle.

In addition to the knuckle, there are two helices upstream of the knuckle in both Prp8 and LINEs that align well in sequence alignments. The two predicted α-helices upstream of knuckle in LINEs tended to be separated by LP. In R2 elements the sequence at the end of the first helix was highly conserved, being KXRINALP(840-847) or similar. In R2Bm the sequence was HTHINALP (see also reference [24]). The two helices prior to the knuckle appear to be present in both RLE and APE LINEs. In the APE LINE L1Hs, the sequence upstream of the gag knuckle that PROMALS3D aligned to the R2 KXRINALP was TMRYHLTP of HMKKCSSSLIAREMQIKTTMRYHLTP. The HMKKC is not shown in the alignment. Conversion of HMKK to AAAA and SSS to AAA reduced retrotransposition activity [5]. In the alignment SSS is below position 828 of R2Bm. A recombinant C-terminal 180 amino acid containing peptide (from SSS to the end of the ORF) bound RNA nonspecifically, but a mutation of the CCHC motif within the peptide did not affect RNA binding [49]. In the full-length protein, however, mutations of the conserved cysteines of the CCHC motif affected RNP formation and knocked out retrotransposition activity in cell culture assays [5, 50]. In Prp8, the non-zinc knuckle is predicted to make contact with mRNA in the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP complex [51].

The helices upstream of Prp8’s knuckle include an important loop (1585 loop, sometimes called the α-finger) that is important for binding RNA [51, 52]. The R2RLE LINE KXRINALP(840-847) helix equivalent in Prp8 was located at Prp8 residues 1592-1602 of the 1585 loop. The loop and helix region was found to be dynamic in Prp8 [21, 5153]. In the U4/U6.U5 tri snRNP (cryo-EM structure 3JCM) the area forms a loop (QFKK, 1586-1589) plus an α-helix (HAQRTG, 1592-1597) [51]. The loop residues contact RNA and the Dib1 protein and were involved in branch point selection [51, 52]. After branching (cryo-EM structure 5LJ3), the area is not helical [54]. In the crystal structure (c4i43B), which lacks RNA, this area is unresolved and thus is likely unstructured [21].

RLE LINEs, like R2Bm, encode a restriction-like DNA endonuclease downstream of the IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle (Fig. 4b). The DNA endonuclease found in RLE LINEs was found to have a fairly canonical αβββαβ restriction endonuclease-like fold, although it had a unique variant of the PD-(D/E)XK catalytic core [19]. The catalytic K, which is usually near the D/E residue in the third β-sheet, was found to be located much farther away in LINE RLE. The catalytic K in the LINE RLE is the first K in the KX2KY motif. The second K is less conserved across R2 elements and across RLE LINEs. The motif is located in the second α-helix [19]. The Y of the KX2KY, when mutated, also reduces cleavage [19]. The catalytic K in Prp8 is located in an identical position as the RLE of LINEs. The Y residue is also present in Prp8 and is identically positioned relative to the catalytic K. The second K of the LINE KX2KY is not present. The similarities between the Prp8 RLE and the LINE RLE go beyond the endonuclease fold and the positioning of the catalytic residues. At the far end of the endonuclease fold, just beyond the fourth β-strand, is a mutually conserved GXW motif. At the other end of the RLE fold—at the beginning of the first α-helix—is a conserved H residue and a conserved K residue. In R2Bm the equivalent is RH. Mutating the RH residues in R2Bm severely reduces DNA binding and DNA cleavage [19]. At the end of the first β-strand of both Prp8 and LINE RLEs is a conserved D/E that also appears to be unique to these two groups. Except for a 22 amino acid insertion between β-sheets 2 and 3 of Prp8, both Prp8 and LINE endonucleases are about the same size. The Prp8 endonuclease appears to have the amino acid residues needed for the cleavage activity, but the residues do not appear to be involved in metal coordination in the crystal structure; rather, these residues stabilize the polypeptide loop blocking the active site [21].

Comparative bar diagrams comparing R2Bm, Prp8, and LtrA ORF structure are presented in Fig. 5b. The RT, Linker, and RLE are highlighted in green, maroon, and orange, respectively. The areas of the ORF that have been aligned, homology modeled, or deemed structurally equivalent are also indicated. The secondary structure present in the linker of R2Bm and Prp8 is depicted. The areas of the linker that align in sequence (HINALP/1585-loop regions) or by structure (knuckle) are indicated in maroon. Ribbon diagrams are also given for RT-RLE for R2Bm (Fig. 5c) and Prp8 (Fig. 5d) using the same color scheme as the bar diagrams. A structural overlay (ribbon diagrams) of R2Bm RT and RLE onto Prp8 RT-RLE is presented in Fig. 5e. A second overlay between R2Bm and Prp8 is presented in Fig. 5f in which the R2Bm RT is a surface model and is colored an in Fig. 3e. Also colored in Fig. 5f is the Prp8 non-zinc knuckle and the 1585 loop region (both red). The Prp8 knuckle and 1585 loop regions are positioned near the top of the thumb. The knuckle also is positioned near the RLE. It sits between the thumb and RLE. The 1585 loop is oriented toward the fingers of the RT. The R2Bm RT equivalents (HINALP region and knuckle) may also be closely associated with the thumb. Having the linker associated with the thumb would explain, in part, why the thumb is protected from cleavage.
Fig. 5

A Comparison of domain architechture of R2Bm, Prp8, and LtrA group II intron proteins. a The amino acid equivalences between ΔNR2Bm and that of the full length R2Bm ORF (genbank entry M16558.1) is such that the 2nd amino acid of the ΔNR2Bm ORF is 70th amino acid of full length R2Bm. b The ORF structure of ΔNR2Bm, S. cerevisiae Prp8, and L. lactis LtrA are presented as a colored bar diagrams. The RT is green, the linker is a maroon, and the RLE is orange. The RT sequence-motif blocks are indicated with approximate primary amino acid numbers. The locations of the fingers are also shown. The bar diagrams are not drawn to scale. The domains and numbering for Prp8 and LtrA group II intron are largely from [22, 52, 70, 71]. Brackets indicate regions of R2Bm that align well with corresponding region of Prp8. The RT and the RLE align well in sequence and by structure modeling with Prp8. In the linker, the sequence of (and around) the colored α-helices (rounded bars) with an asterisk align when well when anchored by the reverse transcriptase and the RLE. The colored β-strands and the α-helix lacking an asterisk do not align well but (may) form a knuckle that is structurally similar. The secondary structure is predicted in R2Bm, but known in Prp8 (3JCM). c Ribbon diagrams of the R2Bm RT and RLE models. The ribbons have been colored as in the the cooresponding bar diagram. d Ribbon diagrams of the Prp8 cryo-EM structure (3JCM, RT to RLE) is shown in matching color bar diagram. e Ribbon overlay of R2Bm (tan) with Prp8 large fragment (blue). f The R2Bm reverse transcriptase model as colored in Fig. 3e, a ribbon model of the R2Bm RLE and the large fragment of Prp8 (blue with red 1585 loop and knuckle). Abbreviations: palm traversing helix (pth); DNA binding domain (DBD); Endonuclease (EN). All other abbreviations and symbols are as in previous figures

Discussion

The R2Bm protein was found to be comprised of two major globular domains: the ZF/Myb/−1 N-terminal domain and the RT/linker/RLE superdomain. The index finger of the RT and the −1 region were the most accessible areas for protease cleavages to occur, indicating that these regions might represent flexible conformational-switch areas that may help coordinate the nucleic acid binding and cleavage activities of the two globular domains. The ZF/Myb/−1 region is present among all of the early branching LINE elements with a variable number of ZFs and Myb motifs [55]. The primary variability in the RT/linker/RLE superdomain was in the linker, with Cre elements often having a deletion relative to R2 and Utopia having an insertion. The linker was predicted to be largely α-helical across all RLE LINEs and, we hypothesize, closely associated with both the RT thumb and the RLE, similar to Prp8. The linker of R2 contained several highly conserved sequence motifs and secondary structures, most notably the presumptive-ββα-forming IAP/gag-like CCHC zinc-knuckle. Just upstream of the knuckle in R2 elements are several well aligned and predicted α-helices separated by the highly conserved KXRINALP(840-847) motif. The two appear to be present in both RLE and APE LINEs. Mutations in this region affected retrotransposition in L1Hs [5, 50].

The linker of Prp8 was also found to have an non-zinc knuckle structure and an upstream dynamic loop plus helix region (1585 loop region) important for interacting with nucleic acids [5153]. In Prp8 the 1585 loop region sits on top of the RT thumb and is oriented toward the fingers of the RT. It would appear tha the region immediately upstream of the knuckle in RLE LINE, APE LINEs, and Prp8 might be structurally conserved and, to a degree, functionally conserved. If the helices preceding the knuckle in LINEs were positioned as in Prp8, it is easy to envision the region participating in binding to element RNA or target DNA.

The gag knuckle-like motif and associated upstream helices might promote switching between polymerase active and endonuclease active conformations of the R2 protein in response to binding insertion reaction intermediates. Our proteolysis study was done in the absence of nucleic acids. In the absence of RNA, the R2 protein would be expected to adopt a conformation that would have characteristics of the conformation involved in second-strand cleavage. It is possible that in the presence of RNA or DNA our results would differ from those presented as the nucleic acid might block some sites from being cleaved while presenting other newly accessible sites due to protein conformational changes induced by nucleic acid binding.

The RT of Prp8 has been noted to share similarities to RdRP and to the RTs encoded by mobile group II introns and LINEs [26, 34]. However, because Ppr8 and the group II intron protein both function as splicing maturases, the similarity to group II introns has been stressed. The RLE LINE RT, however, appears to be more similar to Prp8 given the presence of an index finger and a palm traversing helix although our phylogenetic studies (not reported) using the RT were inconclusive. In addition to the RT both Prp8 and RLE LINEs have a RLE. While it has been noted in the literature that the large fragment of Prp8 contains an RLE, the connection to LINEs had not been presented beyond noting that LINEs also contain an RT and an RLE. Using sequence and structure comparisons, we may have been able to infer insights that are not yet forthcoming in phylogenetic trees. In this paper, we have shown that the LINE RT, linker, and RLE share more points of commonality to the large fragment of Prp8 than does the group II intron maturase.

Conclusions

The protein encoded by RLE LINEs was shown to consist of two major globular domains. The larger of the two globular domain contained the RT, linker, and RLE and was found to be similar to the large fragment of the spliceosomal protein Prp8. The RLE, RT, and linker of LINEs and Prp8 shared a greater degree of structural and sequence similarity to each other than to the maturase of mobile group II introns.

Methods

Protein expression and purification

R2Bm protein was expressed and purified as previously described [19]. Briefly, the R2Bm protein used in this study was ΔNR2Bm. The ΔNR2Bm construct removes the variable N-terminal found in R2 elements (amino acid 2 of ΔNR2Bm = amino acid 70 of genbank entry M16558.1) and adds a six histidine tag on the C-terminal end of the protein [19]. The ΔNR2Bm expression construct was put into BL21 Escherichia coli cells. Five hundred milliliter cultures were grown in LB broth, expressed with IPTG, lysed, and the soluble material purified over a Talon affinity column (Clontech #635501). The R2Bm protein was eluted off the column in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 50% glycerol, 0.1% triton X-100, 150 mM imidazole. Proteins were stored in elution buffer supplemented with 1 mM DTT (final concentration) at −20 °C. R2 protein was quantified by SYPRO Orange (Sigma #S5692) staining of samples run on SDS-PAGE relative to a BSA standard (Biorad #500-0202). All quantitations were done using Fiji software analysis of digital photographs [56].

Limited proteolysis of R2Bm protein and processing of the polypeptides

Limited digestion of purified R2 protein was carried out in the absence of nucleic acids using a trace amount of GluC (NEB, #P8100S) or LysC (Promega, #V1671) protease. Digestion was stopped using SDS loading buffer (to a final concentration of 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.8 final; 4% SDS; 10 mM DTT) and heated. Proteolytic fragments were carbamidomethylated (55 mM final, Alfa aesar, #A14715) in the loading buffer in the dark at room temperature for 30 min prior to loading onto a precast (Biorad criterion polyacrylamide gel, 18% and 4-15%) SDS-PAGE gel [57]. The resolved protein fragments were stained with colloidal coomassie blue (Invitrogen, #LC6025). Prominent bands from across the proteolytic time course were excised from the gel, cut into 1 mm pieces, and destained using 25 mM NH4HCO3/50% Acetonitrile (ACN). Gel pieces were shrunk with 100% ACN (VWR, #BDH6002-4) and dried by Speed Vac (Eppendorf) [5860].

The primary amines, including the amino-terminal end of the proteolytic fragments, were acetylated in the gel slice using 15% acetic anhydride (Sigma, #320102) for five hours at room temperature within the individual excised gel fragments [61, 62]. Acetylation was stopped by adding 1 M NH4HCO3 (Sigma, #40867) solution [61, 62]. After 20 min, the gel pieces were shrunk by 100% ACN.

The dried gel pieces were swelled in 25 mM NH4HCO3 containing trypsin or GluC for 1.5 h at 4 °C and any unabsorbed NH4HCO3 solution was then discarded [5860]. The gel pieces were covered with 25 mM NH4HCO3 and the in-gel digestion was carried out overnight at 37 °C. Peptides from in-gel digestion reaction were collected in the supernatant. Additional extractions with 0.1% formic acid (FA) (Sigma, #399388) and 50% ACN/0.1% FA were also collected and added to the supernatant [5860]. The supernatant was dried in a Speed Vac and purified over C18 zip tip using standard procedures [5860].

To catch any major cleavage sites that did not result in isolatable SDS-page bands, limited proteolysis reactions were run on an SDS-PAGE gel for a very short time so as to not resolve bands, rather keeping them clustered near the well. The top portions of these lanes were excised and processed as above so as to remove triton and otherwise prepare the polypeptides for mass spectrometry, thus avoiding the precipitation of the larger R2Bm protein fragments that occurs if the polypeptide processing (for mass spectrometry) was done in solution instead of in-gel. This abbreviated in-gel procedure is roughly equivalent to a direct “in-solution” detection of cleavage sites.

Mass spectrometry and Edman degradation

The eluted peptides were resuspended in 0.1% FA for sequencing by nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS using a Thermo Scientific LTQ Velos Pro ion trap mass spectrometer. R2 peptides were identified using Thermo Proteome Discoverer software (version 2.0); a database of R2Bm protein fragments was created, and a peptide was assigned as either N-terminal end or internal peptide based on the position of acetyl groups in the peptide sequence [61]. The internal peptides generated after trypsin (second) digestion will lack an acetyl group at the N-terminal end, as acetylation is performed prior to the second protease digestion step.

Amino-terminal sequencing of the separated proteolytic fragments was used to map the protease cleavage sites back onto the primary sequence of R2 and thus delimit globular domain boundaries. The internal peptides were also identified from the MS/MS spectrum. The internal peptide coverage and sequence were used to help verify the peptide location within the R2 ORF and to act as a rough estimation of the C-terminal boundary of the fragment, along with SDS-PAGE estimation of the fragment’s molecular weight. The Glu-C cleavage heatmap was generated using Gitools [63].

For detection by Edman degradation, an SDS-PAGE gel was electrophoresed onto a PVDF membrane. Excised bands on the PVDF membrane were sent to UT Southwestern proteomics core for Edman sequencing.

3D modeling and multiple sequence alignments

The Phyre 2.0 protein fold recognition server was used to model the RT domain of R2Bm protein [25]. The intensive mode with default parameters of Phyre 2.0 were used. Different lengths of R2Bm sequence upstream and downstream of RT domain were submitted for modeling to find the sequence window that modeled the best. Model visualization was aided by UCSF Chimera package [64].

The PROMALS3D server was used for structure based alignment with minor manual adjustments [6567]. Seventy five LINE sequences were aligned first in PROMALS3D server that included 31 RLE LINE and 44 APE LINEs. Using this LINE alignment as constraint, an extended alignment was built with three nMat proteins, five group II introns, seven RVT genes and 10 Prp8 proteins. The secondary structure was plotted on the multiple sequence alignment using the Ali2D program of the MPI bioinformatic tool kit [67, 68].

Abbreviations

APE: 

Apurinic-apyrimidinic family endonuclease

LINE: 

Long interspersed element (also called non-LTR retrotransposon)

ORF: 

Open reading frame

RLE: 

Restriction-like endonuclease

RNP: 

Ribonucleoprotein particles

RT: 

Reverse transcriptase

TPRT: 

Target primed reverse transcriptase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the Chowdhury lab, especially Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal, as well as the staff at the Shimadzu Center for Advanced Analytical Chemistry for collective discussions and help with mass spectrometry. We would like to thank members of the Christensen lab for critical reading of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank Micki Christensen for copy editing.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation [0950983] and by a University of Texas Arlington Research Enhancement grant, both awarded to Shawn Christensen. Additional support was from a Phi Sigma grant awarded to Murshida Mahbub. The Thermo Scientific LTQ Velos Pro ion trap mass spectrometer was purchased maintained with startup funds awarded to Saiful M. Chowdhury.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MM performed all of the experiments, including mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. She helped with designing the experiments and with interpreting the results. M also helped to write the paper. SMC was the mass spectrometry expert. He provided experimental design help with how to prepare the protein for mass spectrometry and how to determine the N-terminal ends. He provided expert help in interpreting the mass spectra. S provided the mass spectrometer and the funds related to running the mass spectrometer. SMC was the transposable element expert. He broadly designed all aspects of the project, including experimental design, bioinformatics, and result interpretation. He wrote the paper and provided the funding for MM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington
(2)
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington

References

  1. Luan DD, Korman MH, Jakubczak JL, Eickbush TH. Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell. 1993;72:595–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen SM, Ye J, Eickbush TH. RNA from the 5′ end of the R2 retrotransposon controls R2 protein binding to and cleavage of its DNA target site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17602–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen SM, Eickbush TH. R2 target-primed reverse transcription: ordered cleavage and polymerization steps by protein subunits asymmetrically bound to the target DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6617–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng Q, Moran JV, Kazazian HHJ, Boeke JD. Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition. Cell. 1996;87:905–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moran JV, Holmes SE, Naas TP, DeBerardinis RJ, Boeke JD, Kazazian HHJ. High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells. Cell. 1996;87:917–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eickbush TH, Eickbush DG. Integration, regulation, and long-term stability of R2 Retrotransposons. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:MDNA3-0011. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0011-2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Eickbush TH. R2 and related site-specific non-long terminal repeat Retrotransposons. In: Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM, editors. Mobile DNA II. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2002. p. 813–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Moran JV, Gilbert N. Mammalian LINE-1 Retrotransposons and related elements. In: Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM, editors. Mobile DNA II. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2002. p. 836–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zingler N, Weichenrieder O, Schumann GG. APE-type non-LTR retrotransposons: determinants involved in target site recognition. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110:250–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Richardson SR, Doucet AJ, Kopera HC, Moldovan JB, Garcia-Perez JL, Moran JV. The influence of LINE-1 and SINE Retrotransposons on mammalian genomes. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:MDNA3-0061. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0061-2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujiwara H. Site-specific non-LTR retrotransposons. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:MDNA3-0001. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0001-2014.Google Scholar
  12. Babushok DV, Kazazian HH. Progress in understanding the biology of the human mutagen LINE-1. Hum Mutat. 2007;28:527–39. doi: 10.1002/humu.20486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weichenrieder O, Repanas K, Perrakis A. Crystal structure of the targeting endonuclease of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon. Structure. 2004;12:975–86. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Repanas K, Zingler N, Layer LE, Schumann GG, Perrakis A, Weichenrieder O. Determinants for DNA target structure selectivity of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4914–26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm516.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Khazina E, Weichenrieder O. Non-LTR retrotransposons encode noncanonical RRM domains in their first open reading frame. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:731–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Schneider AM, Schmidt S, Jonas S, Vollmer B, Khazina E, Weichenrieder O. Structure and properties of the esterase from non-LTR retrotransposons suggest a role for lipids in retrotransposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:10563–72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt786.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Januszyk K, Li PW, Villareal V, Branciforte D, Wu H, Xie Y, Feigon J, Loo JA, Martin SL, Clubb RT. Identification and solution structure of a highly conserved C-terminal domain within ORF1p required for retrotransposition of long interspersed nuclear element-1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24893–904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Khazina E, Truffault V, Buttner R, Schmidt S, Coles M, Weichenrieder O. Trimeric structure and flexibility of the L1ORF1 protein in human L1 retrotransposition. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1006–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Govindaraju A, Cortez JD, Reveal B, Christensen SM. Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:3276–87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw134.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dlakić M, Mushegian A. Prp8, the pivotal protein of the spliceosomal catalytic center, evolved from a retroelement-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA. 2011;17:799–808. doi: 10.1261/rna.2396011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Galej WP, Oubridge C, Newman AJ, Nagai K. Crystal structure of Prp8 reveals active site cavity of the spliceosome. Nature. 2013;493:638–43. doi: 10.1038/nature11843.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Qu G, Kaushal PS, Wang J, Shigematsu H, Piazza CL, Agrawal RK, Belfort M, Wang HW. Structure of a group II intron in complex with its reverse transcriptase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:549–57. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jamburuthugoda VK, Eickbush TH. Identification of RNA binding motifs in the R2 retrotransposon-encoded reverse transcriptase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:8405–15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku514.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Burke WD, Malik HS, Jones JP, Eickbush TH. The domain structure and retrotransposition mechanism of R2 elements are conserved throughout arthropods. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:502–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao C, Pyle AM. Crystal structures of a group II intron maturase reveal a missing link in spliceosome evolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:558–65. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Ng KK, Cherney MM, Vazquez AL, Machin A, Alonso JM, Parra F, James MN. Crystal structures of active and inactive conformations of a caliciviral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1381–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109261200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu J, Liu W, Gong P. A structural overview of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases from the Flaviviridae family. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:12943–57. doi: 10.3390/ijms160612943.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu G, Gong P. A structural view of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases from the Flavivirus genus. Virus Res. 2017;234:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.01.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu G, Gong P. Crystal structure of the full-length Japanese encephalitis virus NS5 reveals a conserved methyltransferase-polymerase interface. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003549. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003549.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson AA, Peersen OB. Structural basis for proteolysis-dependent activation of the poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 2004;23:3462–71. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillis AJ, Schuller AP, Skordalakes E. Structure of the Tribolium Castaneum telomerase catalytic subunit TERT. Nature. 2008;455:633–7. doi: 10.1038/nature07283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nikonov A, Juronen E, Ustav M. Functional characterization of fingers subdomain-specific monoclonal antibodies inhibiting the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24089–102. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803422200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambowitz AM, Belfort M. Mobile bacterial group II Introns at the crux of eukaryotic evolution. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:MDNA3-0050. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0050-2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zimmerly S, Wu L. An unexplored diversity of reverse Transcriptases in bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:MDNA3-0058. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0058-2014.Google Scholar
  36. Shu B, Gong P. Structural basis of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase catalysis and translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E4005–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602591113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Arnold JJ, Cameron CE. Poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3Dpol) is sufficient for template switching in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2706–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Chen B, Lambowitz AM. De novo and DNA primer-mediated initiation of cDNA synthesis by the mauriceville retroplasmid reverse transcriptase involve recognition of a 3′ CCA sequence. J Mol Biol. 1997;271:311–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohr S, Ghanem E, Smith W, et al. Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase fusion proteins and their use in cDNA synthesis and next-generation RNA sequencing. RNA. 2013;19:958–70. doi: 10.1261/rna.039743.113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. SQ G, Cui X, Mou S, Mohr S, Yao J, Lambowitz AM. Genetic identification of potential RNA-binding regions in a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA. 2010;16:732–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Watanabe K, Lambowitz AM. High-affinity binding site for a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase/maturase within a stem-loop structure in the intron RNA. RNA. 2004;10:1433–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang J, Brown AF, Wu J, Xue J, Bley CJ, Rand DP, Wu L, Zhang R, Chen JJ, Lei M. Structural basis for protein-RNA recognition in telomerase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:507–12. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2819.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell M, Gillis A, Futahashi M, Fujiwara H, Skordalakes E. Structural basis for telomerase catalytic subunit TERT binding to RNA template and telomeric DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:513–8. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1777.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wyatt HDM, West SC, Beattie TL. InTERTpreting telomerase structure and function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:5609–22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq370.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Gladyshev EA, Arkhipova IR. A widespread class of reverse transcriptase-related cellular genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:20311–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Xiong Y, Eickbush TH. Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. EMBO J. 1990;9:3353–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Arkhipova IR, Batzer MA, Brosius J, Feschotte C, Moran JV, Schmitz J, Jurka J. Genomic impact of eukaryotic transposable elements. Mob DNA. 2012;3:19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Grishin NV. Structural classification of zinc fingers: survey and summary. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:532–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Piskareva O, Ernst C, Higgins N, Schmatchenko V. The carboxy-terminal segment of the human LINE-1 ORF2 protein is involved in RNA binding. FEBS Open Bio. 2013;3:433–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.09.005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Doucet AJ, Hulme AE, Sahinovic E, et al. Characterization of LINE-1 ribonucleoprotein particles. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Wan R, Yan C, Bai R, Wang L, Huang M, Wong CC, Shi Y. The 3.8 Å structure of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP: insights into spliceosome assembly and catalysis. Science. 2016;351:466–75. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nguyen TH, Galej WP, Bai XC, Oubridge C, Newman AJ, Scheres SH, Nagai K. Cryo-EM structure of the yeast U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP at 3.7 Å resolution. Nature. 2016;530:298–302. doi: 10.1038/nature16940.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Bertram K, Agafonov DE, Liu WT, Dybkov O, Will CL, Hartmuth K, Urlaub H, Kastner B, Stark H, Lührmann R. Cryo-EM structure of a human spliceosome activated for step 2 of splicing. Nature. 2017;542:318–23. doi: 10.1038/nature21079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Galej WP, Wilkinson ME, Fica SM, Oubridge C, Newman AJ, Nagai K. Cryo-EM structure of the spliceosome immediately after branching. Nature. 2016;537:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19316.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Shivram H, Cawley D, Christensen SM. Targeting novel sites: the N-terminal DNA binding domain of non-LTR retrotransposons is an adaptable module that is implicated in changing site specificities. Mob Genet Elements. 2011;1:169–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lane LC. A simple method for stabilizing protein-sulfhydryl groups during SDS-gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1978;86:655–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Havlis J, Thomas H, Sebela M, Shevchenko A. Fast-response proteomics by accelerated in-gel digestion of proteins. Anal Chem. 2003;75:1300–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem. 1996;68:850–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2856–60. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Chowdhury SM, Munske GR, Yang J, Zhukova D, Nguyen H, Bruce JE. Solid-phase N-terminal peptide enrichment study by optimizing trypsin proteolysis on homoarginine-modified proteins by mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2014;28:635–44. doi: 10.1002/rcm.6820.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Celic I, Masumoto H, Griffith WP, Meluh P, Cotter RJ, Boeke JD, Verreault A. The sirtuins hst3 and Hst4p preserve genome integrity by controlling histone h3 lysine 56 deacetylation. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1280–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Perez-Llamas C, Lopez-Bigas N. Gitools: analysis and visualisation of genomic data using interactive heat-maps. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019541.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1605–12. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pei J, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: multiple protein sequence alignment enhanced with evolutionary and three-dimensional structural information. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:263–71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Larsson A. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3276–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Alva V, Nam SZ, Söding J, Lupas AN. The MPI bioinformatics toolkit as an integrative platform for advanced protein sequence and structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W410–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw348.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Bao W, Kojima KK, Kohany O. Repbase update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob DNA. 2015;6:11. doi: 10.1186/s13100-015-0041-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Galej WP, Nguyen THD, Newman AJ, Nagai K. Structural studies of the spliceosome: zooming into the heart of the machine. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;25:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.12.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Blocker FJ, Mohr G, Conlan LH, Qi L, Belfort M, Lambowitz AM. Domain structure and three-dimensional model of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA. 2005;11:14–28. doi: 10.1261/rna.7181105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement