Skip to main content

Table 2 Normalized number of putative complete LTR-retrotransposons identified in each genome and classified by lineage

From: Virus-like attachment sites as structural landmarks of plants retrotransposons

Plant genomes

Putative complete elements genome contribution by lineage (%)

Ale

Angela

Bianca

Ivana

Maximus

Tar

Athila

CRM

Del

Galadriel

Reina

At

12.0

2.0

5.0

15.0

7.0

12.0

24.0

3.0

11.0

0.0

9.0

Mt

7.8

1.7

0.9

8.4

22.3

10.6

32.0

0.9

12.3

0.0

3.0

Pt

37.8

0.6

0.3

21.1

0.0

8.8

9.4

6.9

0.9

1.8

12.4

Vv

43.8

6.2

4.4

4.6

1.7

10.2

21.7

1.8

0.7

2.1

2.8

Gm

2.3

5.3

0.0

7.3

22.9

4.5

25.2

20.3

1.9

0.0

10.3

Bd

14.8

13.1

3.0

10.1

2.4

1.5

40.9

5.4

2.6

0.0

6.4

Os

6.3

3.9

0.1

4.8

3.6

8.6

45.7

2.2

18.7

0.1

6.0

Si

6.9

28.2

0.0

2.6

0.6

2.5

37.3

7.5

11.8

0.0

2.7

Sb

3.9

1.3

0.6

3.6

7.2

0.4

61.8

4.0

12.9

0.0

4.3

Zm

2.1

1.4

0.2

1.0

36.6

0.5

43.8

2.3

9.2

0.0

2.8

Superfamily

Copia

Copia

Copia

Copia

Copia

Copia

Gypsy

Gypsy

Gypsy

Gypsy

Gypsy

  1. This table indicates the normalized copy-number, as percentages, of LTR-RT elements identified in each genome (including the already described Del lineage) from the ten fully sequenced genomes used (A. thaliana - At, M. truncatula - Mt, P. trichocarpa - Pt, V. vinifera – Vv, G. max - Gm, B. distachyon - Bd, O. sativa – Os, S. italica - Si, S. bicolor – Sb and Z. mays - Zm,). The normalization used the LTR-RT total copy-number in each genome as 100 %